You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Micah's goal
- Thread starter toddy111
- Start date
bluetonium
Well-Known Member
Ref said Barry stopped the opposition player from challenging Micah. Even on MotD 2 said very soft (except for Caveman Keown who said foul). But looking at the replay again the opposition player didn't make any attempt to follow Micah, and Barry hardly even touches him. Should have stood is the general consensus.
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 18,265
toddy111 said:Cheers mate. didn't catch MOTD 2
ABSOLUTE DISGRACE - SHOUL'D HAVE BEEN ALLOWED
THAT'S THE 2ND THEY HAVE DISALLOWED FOR HIM NOW
silverback
Well-Known Member
Look again and watch Tevez being held by their full back Both arms were around his neck.
gary walker
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 156
It was a shit call by the reff. But we got away with it against west hams carlton cole so that ones evend its self out
keemcfc
Well-Known Member
How many more goals will Barry cost Richards?
That was one of the worst descisions ive ever seen, I think god doesnt want Richards to score, He'd be our highest scoring defender if the refs werent blind!
That was one of the worst descisions ive ever seen, I think god doesnt want Richards to score, He'd be our highest scoring defender if the refs werent blind!
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader
Well-Known Member
Crap decision. Barry placed two hands on the back of the defender. The only thing that would have happened is that the defender might not have been able to jump backwards. Just rank poor refereeing, by a rank poor referee. They are getting younger and poorer.
portisheadblue
Well-Known Member
I have watched this several times on OS highlights ... can't see the foul at all .... let's suppose the incident was the other way round ... would the ref have given us a penalty ... erm ... NO ....!!!!!
Maybe this kind of thing could be taken up by FAWatch ....??????
Cheers
Maybe this kind of thing could be taken up by FAWatch ....??????
Cheers
Bill
Well-Known Member
MadchesterCity said:toddy111 said:Cheers mate. didn't catch MOTD 2
ABSOLUTE DISGRACE - SHOUL'D HAVE BEEN ALLOWED
THAT'S THE 2ND THEY HAVE DISALLOWED FOR HIM NOW
he had to disallow it, we'd be in the top 4 if not, and we can't have that can we?
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
de niro said:MadchesterCity said:ABSOLUTE DISGRACE - SHOUL'D HAVE BEEN ALLOWED
THAT'S THE 2ND THEY HAVE DISALLOWED FOR HIM NOW
he had to disallow it, we'd be in the top 4 if not, and we can't have that can we?
I tend to think that way as well.
No surprise that Pool beat the rags to push them back up there.
If I could be arsed to look with would be interesting to see what Villa's refs were like to them last season when they were looking possibles for a top 4.
Is the world really against us or do we just think it is?