SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
It sounds like he’s suggesting we should kill them all, since Hamas doesn’t care anyways….
The blue dog is howling now.
It sounds like he’s suggesting we should kill them all, since Hamas doesn’t care anyways….
The US started restricting immigration in the 1920s. By then around 3m Jews had come to the USA fleeing pogroms in Eastern Europe. There were around 5m Jews in the USA by the start of WW2. Few had wanted to go to Israel, and there was an active anti-Zionist* movement from the 19th century, and it's a very small number now thinking of Aliyah and emigrating to Israel. *Anti-Zionist in the sense of arguing against a Jewish homeland, believing Jews should assimilate (as in make any other country their home, though assimilation can come to mean ceasing to be observant Jews). It's Jeremiah's advice during the Exile (or rather, Yahweh's command):"Seek the welfare of the city where I have sent you into exile, and pray to the Lord on its behalf, for in its welfare you will find your welfare". See the Pittsburgh Platform of 1885: "We consider ourselves no longer a nation, but a religious community, and therefore expect neither a return to Palestine, nor a sacrificial worship under the sons of Aaron, nor the restoration of any of the laws concerning the Jewish state."Yes, most people that are bothered to read and understand Zionist issue know what you say is correct.
I don't know if it's been answered on here, but let me ask anyway; does anybody know why the US turned away the Jews from setting up in their land, at first and why Germany wasn't chosen as a place of resettlement after defeat?
As far as I know the European Ashkenazis are only related by religion the land in Israel, whilst the actual 'indigenous' Jews in the Arab region lived in relative peace with other religious denominations before the settlers came in.
I don’t find the UN to be nearly the effective instrument it was envisaged to be when created. It has become a liberal political tool of coercion that often seeks to place nation states in vulnerable political positions.Now we've established what you meant, that the winners in a war often claim territory, we can turn to the alternative.
UN charter Aims, Article 1: To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace"
So should Israel continue to try and gain territory by war and displacing other people (which you say you were not advocating), or abide by UN resolutions saying they shouldn't? .
What do I know compared to Clinton, but I think this is nonsense.
Or Hoyle laughing at Arsenal fans...
Do you know the context or just posting twitter nonsense?