Milo Yiannopoulos. Love him or hate him?

[stonerblue]

I'm not sure why you have a particular hard on for my review of someone else's post, but I suppose I should take it as a compliment although you ignored my first response as it didn't leave you with much room for manoeuvre did it.

But yes, I do feel Wahhabi Islam is particularly hateful. All of my wife's children that she teaches are Muslims, every December she gets coming up to her and crying.

The reason being is that December is the time of the year that they are taught (in special Islamic class) that anyone that isn't a Muslim "will burn in the fire". Same thing has happened in December in all 3 years that she had been out here and with me. The kids are sad that she "will burn in the fire" as they like her.

Oh. They are six years old by the way. What a good age to start teaching children that anyone different to them will go to hell.

I'm sure it won't stop you being offended by proxy for me telling another poster they gave a good summation of a minor celebrity's good and bad points though.

I'll stand by my view and you can be "quite frankly outraged" all you want. Ta.

And before you ask, there's plenty about Christianity I also find very hateful, I'm just not affected by it where I live.

I thought i was responding to your first post.
You may well be right about wahabbi Islam but that's not what the post you applauded said is it?
I said that the post you agreed with had a 'frankly outrageous' statement in it. Nothing, and i know you may find this hard to believe, to do with you.
Once again to make it crystal, i don't give a shit what you think about a wankers good and bad points. I do find it surprising though that you see nothing wrong in the sentence i highlighted from that dicks post.

 

[blueonblue]

Tut tut, does mummy know you use language like that ?, (I assume from your post your a child)

 

[stonerblue]

Tut tut, does mummy know you use language like that ?, (I assume from your post your a child)

It's 'you're'.

 

[ali benarbia's studs]

blue dipper posting here????

 

[stonerblue]

I thought i was responding to your first post.
You may well be right about wahabbi Islam but that's not what the post you applauded said is it?
I said that the post you agreed with had a 'frankly outrageous' statement in it. Nothing, and i know you may find this hard to believe, to do with you.
Once again to make it crystal, i don't give a shit what you think about a wankers good and bad points. I do find it surprising though that you see nothing wrong in the sentence i highlighted from that dicks post.

No wriggle room in this one Shaunny ?

 

[Thaksinssoldier]

He's a nasty, nasty piece of work...but that doesn't mean some of his points don't have merit. I'm a big believer that free speech is being strangled by the pc sjw's at the moment and they are swinging from liberals to fascists at an alarming rate.

But to focus on Milo and not his agenda, he's nasty. He also undermines himself.

A great example is transgenders. He says it's a mental illness. I tend to agree.

However...he then goes on to individually pick people out from that community and ridicule them.

So what Milo is essentially doing now by his own logic is saying it is acceptable to mock and abuse the mentally ill, which it certainly is not.

So for me, right message (on certain things) wrong messenger.

 

[stonerblue]

He's a nasty, nasty piece of work...but that doesn't mean some of his points don't have merit. I'm a big believer that free speech is being strangled by the pc sjw's at the moment and they are swinging from liberals to fascists at an alarming rate.

But to focus on Milo and not his agenda, he's nasty. He also undermines himself.

A great example is transgenders. He says it's a mental illness. I tend to agree.

However...he then goes on to individually pick people out from that community and ridicule them.

So what Milo is essentially doing now by his own logic is saying it is acceptable to mock and abuse the mentally ill, which it certainly is not.

So for me, right message (on certain things) wrong messenger.

'Mental illness' ???

 

[Thaksinssoldier]

'Mental illness' ???

I think it's a self explanatory phrase.

 

[Jazzman]

He's a nasty, nasty piece of work...but that doesn't mean some of his points don't have merit. I'm a big believer that free speech is being strangled by the pc sjw's at the moment and they are swinging from liberals to fascists at an alarming rate.

But to focus on Milo and not his agenda, he's nasty. He also undermines himself.

A great example is transgenders. He says it's a mental illness. I tend to agree.

However...he then goes on to individually pick people out from that community and ridicule them.

So what Milo is essentially doing now by his own logic is saying it is acceptable to mock and abuse the mentally ill, which it certainly is not.

So for me, right message (on certain things) wrong messenger.

I think this guy Milo is the one with mental illness, being so full of bile towards other human beings. Everyone giving him an audience are helping to legitimize him and his nasty statements. Complicity is also a crime.

 

[Thaksinssoldier]

I think this guy Milo is the one with mental illness, being so full of bile towards other human beings. Everyone giving him an audience are helping to legitimize him and his nasty statements. Complicity is also a crime.

In so long as he is respectful and puts his thoughts across as civil discourse, he has a right to speak. But he's veered off that path a lot lately and invalidated his opinions as such.

But there's an outright attack on free speech at the moment, and if you don't believe that then ask yourself how Trump got elected when everyone assumed he was a joke...simple answer, his voters bit their lip all through the election for fear of being vilified for their political leanings. See also; Brexit.