Mind boggling City double transfer

Was just talking to a mate about the excellent performance by City yesterday. It came up that Cherki cost £34M and Donnaruma £26M and I thought to myself what absolutely ridiculous fees these are for such fantastic players and still so young.

When you think of all the players in recent years who have cost 60M and even double that then the mind certainly boggles haha!!.
Not having it mate. Mansour paid them 1 billion sand particles off the books.

Look like great deals -:)
 
Haha. I was on holiday when The Don rumours started hotting up - with an in-law who is a utd fan - and he was very loud and genuinely convinced that he'd only come here and not there because he was getting, and I quote, £950,000 per week.

I couldn't do anything other than laugh because he knew he was chatting shit and that was the only way he'd accept it.

I just laughed but then said to my red mates ‘I heard Bryan Mbuemo only signed for United as you are paying him £450k a week and really he wanted to sign for Newcastle’
 
It's Man Cheaty

(Joking obvs!)
Over the years we have used the good sheik’s wealth to buy the best players, money no object. Think:
Vinny, Julian, the Viking, Akanji, Donna, Cherki, Foden, O’Reilly, Zabba, and so many more. We are disgusting the way we throw filthy oil money about. We should be investigated.
 
We (our club) don't listen or read or even believe the headlines about which players are the best.... Its all bollocks, produced by a media that know fuck all.

Isak is an excellent example. He really showed his true colours once he finished with Newcastle, Liverpool really should and could have pulled out, but their fans have been read the newspapers, see that isak is the best (he's had a couple of good seasons ffs) and won't accept their club pulling out of the deal.

We are so good at buying the best. All hush hush until they explore into the scene.

And the last ones to notice how good they are is the media.
 
Was just talking to a mate about the excellent performance by City yesterday. It came up that Cherki cost £34M and Donnaruma £26M and I thought to myself what absolutely ridiculous fees these are for such fantastic players and still so young.

When you think of all the players in recent years who have cost 60M and even double that then the mind certainly boggles haha!!.
The best goal scorer in the world cost £51m… when Isak cost £125m.
 
We (our club) don't listen or read or even believe the headlines about which players are the best.... Its all bollocks, produced by a media that know fuck all.

Isak is an excellent example. He really showed his true colours once he finished with Newcastle, Liverpool really should and could have pulled out, but their fans have been read the newspapers, see that isak is the best (he's had a couple of good seasons ffs) and won't accept their club pulling out of the deal.

We are so good at buying the best. All hush hush until they explore into the scene.

And the last ones to ACCEPT how good they are is the media.
I think this is more accurate
 
You've got me thinking how much space that would take up
It all depends on the size of the sand particles. The capacity would range from 27 fuild ounces (0.8 litres) up to 3720 fluid ounces (110 litres). Or 1.69 pints - 232.5 pints (29 gallons).

So, it's not that much unless you're measuring it in beer. Someone driving to and from the match who is a shandy drinking teetotaller (1.69 pints) with 5 mates (29 gallons), who enjoy a fair few pints, for a long bank holiday weekend.

So, not that much. About as much time I have wasted doing this calculation being unable to sleep. I'm not a sand particles expert. AI has its uses. However, I can now rest easy that I have solved this problem that has clearly been plaguing mankind for centuries. Or No One Undertands for a few seconds. No need to thank me. You're welcome.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top