Moores has a massive dig at City and its fans.

''I used to bankroll Liverpool to success when I could afford to and so Liverpool could outspend everyone else and we won loads of trophies but since then all these foreigners coming in have got more money than me and my family and we messed up by selling out to the wrong ones and the (Liver) pools is crap now cos everyone does the lottery instead. BooHooSobSob.''

I love the way these wankers try and re-write history as if they never threw more money at their teams than most others and thereby bought success. Manure fans are just as bad of course.
 
Whats ironic, is the consortium Moores did decide to sell to; really progressed the club and haven't at all broke any ethical or moral values, have they?!

Think before you speak you thick ****... how did you ever get to run Liverpool when you can't see past you're own bloody nose?

Oh and if you'd actually approached our fans, theres was plenty of disapproval over Shinawatra's tenure, i know of fans who refused to go to games whilst he was in charge... Rascal still hasn't come back on here since it happened.

Moores is an ignorant, totally misinformed and ironically ironic moron giving his circumstances. What a load of fuckwittery.
 
Balti said:
''I used to bankroll Liverpool to success when I could afford to and so Liverpool could outspend everyone else and we won loads of trophies but since then all these foreigners coming in have got more money than me and my family and we messed up by selling out to the wrong ones and the (Liver) pools is crap now cos everyone does the lottery instead. BooHooSobSob.''

I love the way these wankers try and re-write history as if they never threw more money at their teams than most others and thereby bought success. Manure fans are just as bad of course.

Spot on mate, years and years of cherry picking and paying out big wages and transfer fees was never buying success.

Apparently it's a new MCFC invention lol
 
to be honest. he has a point. obviously the liverpool owners right now are stupid but they didnt kill thousands of people back in their own country. i assume thats what he was referring to.
 
davymcfc said:
to be honest. he has a point. obviously the liverpool owners right now are stupid but they didnt kill thousands of people back in their own country. i assume thats what he was referring to.

He was right when he said a football fans will turn a blind eye to a lot of things if it is right for their club. That's what the majority of Blues did and what the majority of other fans would do if their club was in the same position. It's not like we had many other options. I am still glad we went with Shinawatra and not Ray Ranson as we'd most likely be playing in the Championship or worse now.
 
davymcfc said:
to be honest. he has a point. obviously the liverpool owners right now are stupid but they didnt kill thousands of people back in their own country. i assume thats what he was referring to.

That is a fair point. Thaksin is guilty of some bad stuff in Thailand and I was uncomfortable (to say the least) with him owning City. From what gary has said on this thread though, Moores didn't refuse to do business for that reason, so he's just a stupid old sod trying to make himself look a bit less bad having sold his beloved club to a couple of clowns.
 
Lancet Fluke said:
davymcfc said:
to be honest. he has a point. obviously the liverpool owners right now are stupid but they didnt kill thousands of people back in their own country. i assume thats what he was referring to.

That is a fair point. Thaksin is guilty of some bad stuff in Thailand and I was uncomfortable (to say the least) with him owning City. From what gary has said on this thread though, Moores didn't refuse to do business for that reason, so he's just a stupid old sod trying to make himself look a bit less bad having sold his beloved club to a couple of clowns.

Guilty of what, exactly?

Just interested...
 
Soulboy said:
Lancet Fluke said:
That is a fair point. Thaksin is guilty of some bad stuff in Thailand and I was uncomfortable (to say the least) with him owning City. From what gary has said on this thread though, Moores didn't refuse to do business for that reason, so he's just a stupid old sod trying to make himself look a bit less bad having sold his beloved club to a couple of clowns.

Guilty of what, exactly?

Just interested...


Was behind the policy of murdering drug adicts, it certainly happened under his government. I'm sure lots of people on here will argue that he isn't in any way culpable though.
 
fbloke said:
There seems to be a suggestion that Thaksin would have bothered with the Dippers and that the Sheikh would have then bought them in the way he did City.

One massive plus for CIty and its new owners is COMS.

In order to even get to our level of opportunity for revenue generation in terms of (re-)development opportunities hundreds of millions of pounds would be needed.

City were the best value option then and probably still are.
Spot on!! I don't think you can play down the new stadium aspect, crucial in the purchase of City and probably the way forward for most clubs.
 
Lancet Fluke said:
Soulboy said:
Guilty of what, exactly?

Just interested...


Was behind the policy of murdering drug adicts, it certainly happened under his government. I'm sure lots of people on here will argue that he isn't in any way culpable though.

But you said he was guilty. And that's a legal term.

So what you're saying is that you heard he was responsible for things... Ah, that explains it then. Isn't it a shame the legal system doesn't work in that far simpler way?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.