MOTD.........Again!!

coulsonblue said:
ha just watched it again on the website highlights, and can't believe people have been saying it wasn't a pen. (Prob this obsession with Onouha), but Onouha does not touch the ball. Stone wall penalty.
I think we didn't get it because he'd not given one for the dive at the other end.
 
I don't think MOTD nor the BBC are Bias "Against" us, but I don't think they "like" us either. We are not the media darlings. I just think MOTD is a poor programme for the majority of clubs.

We know what has happened in the whole of our games and therefore how much of a crock of shit their "Highlights" end up being, but i'm pretty sure this happens for the majority of the other clubs too, it's just that we don't know about the gaping holes in the highlights of other matches.

The presenting is poor, punditry is woefully cliche, the coverage is shocking and the analysis is non existant.

Give me MNF anytime?
 
Pigeonho said:
People are clearly going into these programme's now in the search of things to piss and moan about.
That's exactly what they do.

Plus there are edited and extended highlights of every single game we play on mcfc.co.uk and you can make your own mind up on things and be your own pundit (plus there are loads of good posters across most of the main City forums to have a look at different people's takes on games), so why do people moan about where we are in the running order on MOTD or what highlights they show or what the pundits say?<br /><br />-- Thu Jan 31, 2013 9:42 am --<br /><br />
Graceyboy said:
I don't think MOTD nor the BBC are Bias "Against" us, but I don't think they "like" us either. We are not the media darlings. I just think MOTD is a poor programme for the majority of clubs.

We know what has happened in the whole of our games and therefore how much of a crock of shit their "Highlights" end up being, but i'm pretty sure this happens for the majority of the other clubs too, it's just that we don't know about the gaping holes in the highlights of other matches.

The presenting is poor, punditry is woefully cliche, the coverage is shocking and the analysis is non existant.

Give me MNF anytime?
United fans are always moaning about it, and always have - and they have been fuckin boring with it for twenty years - about MOTD being a Liverpool programme with Liverpool pundits for Liverpool fans "Gary Linekar hates Fergie" "Gary Linekar hates United" "all the pundits love Liverpool" "Linekar made everyone do the Poznań at SPOTY, Fergie should stop taking to the BBC cos they hate us" (most boring fans in the world; bad thing is, our weekly "agenda" shite is equally as boring and becoming equally as common!).
 
Graceyboy said:
I don't think MOTD nor the BBC are Bias "Against" us, but I don't think they "like" us either. We are not the media darlings. I just think MOTD is a poor programme for the majority of clubs.

We know what has happened in the whole of our games and therefore how much of a crock of shit their "Highlights" end up being, but i'm pretty sure this happens for the majority of the other clubs too, it's just that we don't know about the gaping holes in the highlights of other matches.

The presenting is poor, punditry is woefully cliche, the coverage is shocking and the analysis is non existant.

Give me MNF anytime?

Sense
 
coulsonblue said:
ha just watched it again on the website highlights, and can't believe people have been saying it wasn't a pen. (Prob this obsession with Onouha), but Onouha does not touch the ball. Stone wall penalty.

Of course he touched the ball. You've got 4 views in slow motion and 2 of them show that he touched it. Phil Dowd gets one view at full speed and he has to be 100% sure that he's committed a foul to give the pen.

paulchapo said:
Showed QPR's penalty shout which was a blatant dive and not ours,or Aguero's disallowed goal,pricks!

What QPR penalty shout? You mean the dive outside the area past Lescott's leg.

Aguero was a metre or more offside, it was hardly controversial.

Nobody has mentioned when the ball hit Nelsen's hand from a few metres, or 'the blatant handball not given against Nelsen' as some pillocks will see it.

FFS get over yourselves, if I was the editor trying to cram all those games in I'd have shown the Hart save, the Cesar save off Barry. Zaba hitting the bar and Dave's shot that didn't quite spill out to Aguero, and that's it. Then put up City had 70% posession and went round in circles.
 
Carver said:
coulsonblue said:
ha just watched it again on the website highlights, and can't believe people have been saying it wasn't a pen. (Prob this obsession with Onouha), but Onouha does not touch the ball. Stone wall penalty.

Of course he touched the ball. You've got 4 views in slow motion and 2 of them show that he touched it. Phil Dowd gets one view at full speed and he has to be 100% sure that he's committed a foul to give the pen.

paulchapo said:
Showed QPR's penalty shout which was a blatant dive and not ours,or Aguero's disallowed goal,pricks!

What QPR penalty shout? You mean the dive outside the area past Lescott's leg.

Aguero was a metre or more offside, it was hardly controversial.

Nobody has mentioned when the ball hit Nelsen's hand from a few metres, or 'the blatant handball not given against Nelsen' as some pillocks will see it.

FFS get over yourselves, if I was the editor trying to cram all those games in I'd have shown the Hart save, the Cesar save off Barry. Zaba hitting the bar and Dave's shot that didn't quite spill out to Aguero, and that's it. Then put up City had 70% posession and went round in circles.
And this is what everyone seems to forget when questioning these decisions.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.