MOTD pundits

[1894]

Not very impressed with MOTD last night. Too much negative talk again about Hughes sacking (Shearer having his say) and too many negative comments during the actual match commentary.

When will someone fire these pundits and get some decent ones ?

 

[TINY]

Not very impressed with MOTD last night. Too much negative talk again about Hughes sacking (Shearer having his say) and too many negative comments during the actual match commentary.

When will someone fire these pundits and get some decent ones ?

decent being complimentary to City?

 

[dom]

Totally negative coverage.

No mention of our iproved defensive performance , which thay have be droning on about for weeks..

Pathetic tossers

 

[PauloCity]

The commentary was so anti-City and negative, it was unbelievable.

We should all with-hold our license fee. Serious!!!!!

 

[Spindash]

Not very impressed with MOTD last night. Too much negative talk again about Hughes sacking (Shearer having his say) and too many negative comments during the actual match commentary.

When will someone fire these pundits and get some decent ones ?

decent being complimentary to City?

Decent as in not peppering the commentary with pointless sarcastic remarks about Mancini, and then not focusing on the one player who didn't play well after a team wins, and then not whinging about something that happened seven days ago.

 

[1894]

Hard to find totally objective pundits. Lineker gets on my wick. See this...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... nt-it.html

 

[yatesy94]

Shearer = Boring.

Lawrenson = Twat.

Lineker = Don't mind him, not a patch on Lynam though.

Chiles = Doesn't really contribute much to the footballing matters, but he has a funny, dry wit about him that I like.

Dixon = Not just because he's complimentary to us, he just overall gives a fair view of what thinks which is how it should be.

Hansen = I like hansen, he has a good knowledge of football and he gets straight to the point which I like.


______________________________________________________

My sugguestion is, replace Shearer with Chris Kamara. Things this man comes out with are simply comedy gold.

 

[1894]

Shearer = Boring.

Lawrenson = Twat.

Lineker = Don't mind him, not a patch on Lynam though.

Chiles = Doesn't really contribute much to the footballing matters, but he has a funny, dry wit about him that I like.

Dixon = Not just because he's complimentary to us, he just overall gives a fair view of what thinks which is how it should be.

Hansen = I like hansen, he has a good knowledge of football and he gets straight to the point which I like.


______________________________________________________

My sugguestion is, replace Shearer with Chris Kamara. Things this man comes out with are simply comedy gold.

He'd liven things up a bit, wot !

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Not very impressed with MOTD last night. Too much negative talk again about Hughes sacking (Shearer having his say) and too many negative comments during the actual match commentary.

When will someone fire these pundits and get some decent ones ?

There seems to be a dearth of any original thinkers. Shearer is a waste of a sofa place, Hansen, Lineker and Lawro are now Establishment and would just maintain the status quo for a fat fee. There is the absence of controversy which often is what footy is about.

We need someone with a new agenda.

 

[Xavvi]

I think I should be a MOTD pundit. I'd be consistent at least.