MOTD

Tricky_Trev said:
lee-mcfc said:
got motd on low and got a stream of david haye fight on;)
Please can u provide the link to that stream mate?
yer pal <a class="postlink" href="http://www.justin.tv/boxingzone/popout/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.justin.tv/boxingzone/popout/</a>
 
lee-mcfc said:
Tricky_Trev said:
Please can u provide the link to that stream mate?
yer pal <a class="postlink" href="http://www.justin.tv/boxingzone/popout/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.justin.tv/boxingzone/popout/</a>
Cheers!
 
mackenzie said:
jimharri said:
Arsenal are going for the title; we're going for fourth. One or two heads on here need a wobble!


Agreed. And after today they are going to figure a whole lot more.
Fair enough I suppose but the way I see it is 7 goals is much more entertaining than 1-0, whoever features.
 
Sheikh Django said:
mackenzie said:
Agreed. And after today they are going to figure a whole lot more.
Fair enough I suppose but the way I see it is 7 goals is much more entertaining than 1-0, whoever features.
Put it this way. If we were in mid table mediocrity (remember that?), and they had games featuring teams going for the title and different games with teams going for fourth (in other words, with us not involved in any way), who would you expect to be shown first? Honestly? And as for Spurs being shown before us;
A. They were anbove us in the table at 3 o'clock.
B. Their game took place earlier in the day than ours. It would make no sense to show us before them.
 
LoveCity said:
lol, Spurs on before us.

Think about it. Whenever you're going to give a demonstration in quality, what do you show first? You show an example of how not to do it ;)
 
jimharri said:
Sheikh Django said:
Fair enough I suppose but the way I see it is 7 goals is much more entertaining than 1-0, whoever features.
Put it this way. If we were in mid table mediocrity (remember that?), and they had games featuring teams going for the title and different games with teams going for fourth (in other words, with us not involved in any way), who would you expect to be shown first? Honestly? And as for Spurs being shown before us;
A. They were anbove us in the table at 3 o'clock.
B. Their game took place earlier in the day than ours. It would make no sense to show us before them.
Yeah you do make sense. I figured they might be a bit flexible though and not have a complete set list before the games were all but over. I've no idea how it works though. Spurs game was entertaining looking at it now to be fair.
 
Sheikh Django said:
jimharri said:
Put it this way. If we were in mid table mediocrity (remember that?), and they had games featuring teams going for the title and different games with teams going for fourth (in other words, with us not involved in any way), who would you expect to be shown first? Honestly? And as for Spurs being shown before us;
A. They were anbove us in the table at 3 o'clock.
B. Their game took place earlier in the day than ours. It would make no sense to show us before them.
Yeah you do make sense. I figured they might be a bit flexible though and not have a complete set list before the games were all but over. I've no idea how it works though. Spurs game was entertaining looking at it now to be fair.

Very eventful. Mackens should have scored many, many more. Hark at Lawrence's excuse making.
 
Could easily have been 1 up before we went 1 up.<br /><br />-- Sat Apr 03, 2010 11:26 pm --<br /><br />I have never seen such vacancy as the vacancy in Laws's face.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top