Mouriniho in the summer???

mcfcdave said:
anybody on here who says they would not want mourinho are lieing bastards.


I must be one then - it would be just a couple of years of an ego trip for him - fun for the media - maybe a cup - zero attention to the fundamentals such as the youth development - zillions spent - zero legacy and then all end in tears - not for me
 
mcfc1632 said:
mcfcdave said:
anybody on here who says they would not want mourinho are lieing bastards.


I must be one then - it would be just a couple of years of an ego trip for him - fun for the media - maybe a cup - zero attention to the fundamentals such as the youth development - zillions spent - zero legacy and then all end in tears - not for me

And he's already said he wants to manage the rags, If he did come he'd only be passing time untill Taggart finally dies.
 
blue1969 said:
Dannyctid said:
I don't want Mouriniho, he is a twat.
Chelsea played boring boring football. Look @ them now scoring loads of goals and really puninshing teams. Mouriniho plays defensive football. If you think the football now is defensive you haven't seen anything yet if we get Mouriniho. Defensive midfielders who break up play and then try and score on counter. If we get 1 up it will be shut up shop. Give Mancini time he is just trying to make us more solid at the back, and pretty much having to do it with a different centre half pairing every week.
Fully agree Danny. I would rather watch decent football and loose than watch tosh and win.
No.
One example.

3 Defenders at 80 minutes, 1-0 down.
Goes to one defender. 2-1 up at 90 minutes.
 
The reason Mansour gave Mancini very little money in January was because he became quite unpopular back home for pumping so much into something they see as no more than a franchise when Dubai is sitting on its ass financially. If he was using the logic of 'you get as much money as time', no money would have ever been spent on Mark Hughes.
 
Dont want the so called special one , everybody hated chelsea s arrogance when he was there ,even the fooking owners of the club ,why the fook should we want him here ,why the fook do we want any italians here , get that geezer from barca if we can get anyone or mr wenger so we can start watching some decent fooking football again....
 
Xavvi said:
The reason Mansour gave Mancini very little money in January was because he became quite unpopular back home for pumping so much into something they see as no more than a franchise when Dubai is sitting on its ass financially. If he was using the logic of 'you get as much money as time', no money would have ever been spent on Mark Hughes.

Is that not his mannor ?
 
mcfcdave said:
anybody on here who says they would not want mourinho are lieing bastards.

Why chop and change every 6mnths, are we really that fickle?

I have a refreshing idea, let's give mancini a couple of seasons and see where that takes us?
 
Xavvi said:
The reason Mansour gave Mancini very little money in January was because he became quite unpopular back home for pumping so much into something they see as no more than a franchise when Dubai is sitting on its ass financially. If he was using the logic of 'you get as much money as time', no money would have ever been spent on Mark Hughes.
Except that Sheikh Mansour's from Abu Dhabi and there's no love lost between them and Dubai. If I've understood it correctly, Abu Dhabi sees Dubai as "all fur coat and no knickers"
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.