Mr Quinn

its skysports and they even turned andy hinchcliffe and if you don't you on your bike to talksports and a midnight radio phone slot
 
To think he's in our hall of fame, he made Tyler sound like the reasonable one today thats how bad he was, he is the only **** in the world that thought there was a reason that was a penalty.
We have a Hall of Fame!
 
Not as upset as most here because I actually hated him as a player. Stood up applauding as he was subbed in his last ever game for us v l'pool 96 relegation game. We nearly saved it after he went off.
 
Quinn is a fucking disgrace. As an ex City player, you simply do not expect the level of contempt that the tw*t displays when commentating on our games .

What the f*ck did City ever do to him , to produce such bitter prejudice ?
 
I think he's a bit confused at the moment about finding the neutral zone while commentating, he always seems to lean towards our opponents so not to be too biased.

He did let it slip at one point " us city fans " I heard.
 
Quinn (and Tyler) are mainly the reasons I no longer give Sky £80 per month!
 
Some of you need to get a grip. Originally he stated that Yaya Toure was lucky not to receive a yellow for his first challenge very early on which was correct. He also mentioned at that point that it could be because it was early on in the game that the yellow card wasn't given. Again a fair point. Yaya then came in late again arguably another yellow card. Yaya was certainly lucky not to have got a yellow at that point.

Late on in the first half we went on the break only for one of our players to be tackled unfairly down by a spurs player (can't remember who now sorry). A yellow was correctly given but he mentioned the yellows that were not given against Yaya which is somehow deplorable to all you lot. He said the penalty against Sterling should never have been given which is an obvious one but he's definitely not a '****' like some of you are making out.

I admit that at times he has almost tried too hard to be as unbiased as possible and that has come across as unfair from our perspective but nothing too bad in my opinion! He has a very balanced and non-biased view when he commentates on our games which we should be proud of when compared to the rags and dippers who really are the cunts of punditry.
 
Is it possible to remove someone from a hall of fame? Because he's trying his best to find out. Someone at City has clearly upset him as he's had it out for us for ages now

I think we ought to mount a campaign to have him removed. He clearly has no love for the club and I think a smallish plaque in his place along the lines of "He was once idolised by City fans but alas he's turned into a ****"
 
I think he's a bit confused at the moment about finding the neutral zone while commentating, he always seems to lean towards our opponents so not to be too biased.

He did let it slip at one point " us city fans " I heard.

He seems to have found a f*cking good way of " hiding " his support for City !

Can't stand the tw*t !

If Hinchcliffe goes the same way, there will be no pundits who have anything good to say about us !
 
Some of you need to get a grip. Originally he stated that Yaya Toure was lucky not to receive a yellow for his first challenge very early on which was correct. He also mentioned at that point that it could be because it was early on in the game that the yellow card wasn't given. Again a fair point. Yaya then came in late again arguably another yellow card. Yaya was certainly lucky not to have got a yellow at that point.

Late on in the first half we went on the break only for one of our players to be tackled unfairly down by a spurs player (can't remember who now sorry). A yellow was correctly given but he mentioned the yellows that were not given against Yaya which is somehow deplorable to all you lot. He said the penalty against Sterling should never have been given which is an obvious one but he's definitely not a '****' like some of you are making out.

I admit that at times he has almost tried too hard to be as unbiased as possible and that has come across as unfair from our perspective but nothing too bad in my opinion! He has a very balanced and non-biased view when he commentates on our games which we should be proud of when compared to the rags and dippers who really are the cunts of punditry.


I think you must be talking about another Niall Quinn because that is not what comes across to the majority who have listened to his commentaries on City !
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top