MUEN - what's gone wrong?

[njmcfc1894]

As a new poster on their website ive noticed the negativity from ther paper is worst than ever along with re-hashed RVP stories, then we have a reporter who took over reporting on city after whiskey nose allegedly banned him from the swamp, James Robson with his bullshit articles.
Peter Spencer wont answer claims from blues of bias or the poor reporting, ive said this on the website before that mark hughes had no time for this paper and mancini has carried it on,spencer see's it as a joke but MUEN has had reports on us selling half the team, when he had that editors questions lark he refused to answer questions but then gets himself all over talksport making out hes got all the answers on city(talksport and mirror are their sources usually)

have they always been this biased or just since takeover? ive supported city since 85 but never used to read the paper(miss the pink)

 

[simonmdm]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

Well the RVP stories ever 24 hours is only like the Sanchez stories last year. I don't bother reading it anymore, they don't even bother making original stories most of the time, I'm sure they just read other papers and then change a few words.

 

[TGR]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

Yep - They always been this biased. I stopped reading it years ago. No objectivity or professionalism in the journalsim whatsoever. Its so bad they have to give it away. On par with the Mirror for anti City bias. I wouldn't wipe my arse with it.

 

[oakiecokie]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

As a new poster on their website ive noticed the negativity from ther paper is worst than ever along with re-hashed RVP stories, then we have a reporter who took over reporting on city after whiskey nose allegedly banned him from the swamp, James Robson with his bullshit articles.
Peter Spencer wont answer claims from blues of bias or the poor reporting, ive said this on the website before that mark hughes had no time for this paper and mancini has carried it on,spencer see's it as a joke but MUEN has had reports on us selling half the team, when he had that editors questions lark he refused to answer questions but then gets himself all over talksport making out hes got all the answers on city(talksport and mirror are their sources usually)

have they always been this biased or just since takeover? ive supported city since 85 but never used to read the paper(miss the pink)

Think you`ll find that the usual City contributor is Stuart Brennan,who writes some very positive stuff about City and over the past couple of seasons,has shown,he has no problems in putting United down,when needed or so.
Robson,appear to "fill in" for other reporters.
Can`t stand Spencer and as others have said on this forum,he is a mad Rag,who appears to show distaste towards our Club at an embarrassing level.

 

[njmcfc1894]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

anyone got the real story on brennan and fergie?

 

[badge]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

i buy the men every day and i can report, in all honesty, that there is no agenda against city or a bias towards un!ted.

wait a minute.......is that guy staring at you?

 

[1972Bramhall_Blue]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

I've always felt they prefered the Rags as long as I can remember (I'm 40) but they've got worse since the takeover.

 

[LoveCity]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

Any other regional newspapers in the country that don't throw full support behind their local team?

 

[jrb]

Re: MUEN -whats gone wrong

Another thing. The comments are no longer censored. The stuff being posted is......

Not only that, most of the stories are aimed at winding up both sets of fans. They are written in a way that attracts comments.

What football related stories are either rehashed from other reports or made up.

The new owners/Editor have really brought this paper down to gutter level. It was bad before regarding City, but it's reached a new low.

 

[WEMBLEY76]

MUEN -whats gone wrong

It's lost in the media,no place for it,should be sold to Sheikh Mansour,and re-launched.