Maldeika said:Balti said:Maldeika said:Maybe some would post if you would not try to harrass them...
There is no basis for a discussion here. That is why I did not write. It is two different perspectives - and I will not find friends right now with mine. For the one team it is a big win - for the other team it is a loss that did not matter as it did not change anything. For it to matter another goal was missing. Like this it was pretty meaningless to Bayern. Every other match this year would have hurt more even if nobody likes to loose.
Just look at the answers in this thread caused by a sentence in a big interview in October and what Daily Fail makes out of it - and what some people here believe.
yes you're right it was meaningless for City and changed nothing
Actually it did not, or? Before you have been on rank 2 in the group - afterwards you were on rank 2 in the group. I know that your players might have gotten a lot of self confidence out of the match - you won on German ground and it was against the CL winner - but you might understand that it did not really bother a team that has won all but 2 matches this seasons - lost this matches mainly because of taking the foot of the gas and individual mistankes - and even out of the lost matches still has gotten the best "worst-case-scenario" - like if you have a headache after a night with a lot of alcohol but you still wake up in your bed and not in the drunk tank of the next police station. It would be different if City would have scored another goal - but without that goal things stayed the same.
It's a lovely analogy, and whilst the result didn't ultimately affect the group I don't think it was as irrelevant as you suggest.