Ticket For Schalke
Well-Known Member
VOOMER said:
Come on son, if you're having a rant at least get a few facts right about Marwood.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Nasri [Merged] continued.
- Thread starter flb
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Come on son, if you're having a rant at least get a few facts right about Marwood.
kun agueroVOOMER said:Marwood should be shown the door asap and Cook should aologise for employing him. These two were happy for the jo and santa cruz deals to go through for huge fees, yet FFP, or not we are hanging around again for a top class player like Nasri. They are the two biggest liabilities at the club and with the 3rd turd from Blackburn joining I think we have a problem.
chase of spades
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 Jan 2010
- Messages
- 1,295
sorry voomer but u are the biggest dick on bluemoon after saying that,fuck off will you!!!!!!citysix said:kun agueroVOOMER said:Marwood should be shown the door asap and Cook should aologise for employing him. These two were happy for the jo and santa cruz deals to go through for huge fees, yet FFP, or not we are hanging around again for a top class player like Nasri. They are the two biggest liabilities at the club and with the 3rd turd from Blackburn joining I think we have a problem.
Isn't the hold up on this deal all about agents fees ?
That's what was mentioned on Friday.
And didn't City say they were taking a stand about not paying agents fees ?
It was said as City see it the player employs the agent to sort out his deal so the player should be the one to pay the agent and not the buying club.
Sounds like common sense to me, only it takes time for some of these players to understand this.
That's what was mentioned on Friday.
And didn't City say they were taking a stand about not paying agents fees ?
It was said as City see it the player employs the agent to sort out his deal so the player should be the one to pay the agent and not the buying club.
Sounds like common sense to me, only it takes time for some of these players to understand this.
Danamy said:VOOMER said:Marwood should be shown the door asap and Cook should aologise for employing him. These two were happy for the jo and santa cruz deals to go through for huge fees, yet FFP, or not we are hanging around again for a top class player like Nasri. They are the two biggest liabilities at the club and with the 3rd turd from Blackburn joining I think we have a problem.
Yeah because that Aguero fella we've just signed is shit isn't he?
have we signed aguero ? well not so difficult pay the clause i think.
The Future's Blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 3,302
As Mancini says, 'Only this'.Jimfv1 said:Isn't the hold up on this deal all about agents fees ?
That's what was mentioned on Friday.
And didn't City say they were taking a stand about not paying agents fees ?
It was said as City see it the player employs the agent to sort out his deal so the player should be the one to pay the agent and not the buying club.
Sounds like common sense to me, only it takes time for some of these players to understand this.
Jimfv1 said:Isn't the hold up on this deal all about agents fees ?
That's what was mentioned on Friday.
And didn't City say they were taking a stand about not paying agents fees ?
It was said as City see it the player employs the agent to sort out his deal so the player should be the one to pay the agent and not the buying club.
Sounds like common sense to me, only it takes time for some of these players to understand this.
what you say is absolutely right but is not custom and practice that the clubs pay agents fees?
I dont know the answer but there have been discussions in the past regarding clubs declaring how much agents fees the pay so clubs do pay them - i think its not the principle i think its the amount being requested - City would not put this deal at this risk for a million gotta be a lot of wonga these greedy bastards are after
Parksidecity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 330
don't think marwood was at the club whehn jo signed
as for nasri - yes lets pay more than we have to , when the player has clearly said he wants to come to the club
stupid post who hasnt a clue what both Marwood and Cook do , back to school soon
as for nasri - yes lets pay more than we have to , when the player has clearly said he wants to come to the club
stupid post who hasnt a clue what both Marwood and Cook do , back to school soon
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Why are people feeling 'sorry' for Bob ?
He gets paid fortunes to control the best squad in the Premier League & has been given hundreds of millions to spend on players. If he can't get Nasri, he'll just have to 'manage' . Isn't that his job ?
He gets paid fortunes to control the best squad in the Premier League & has been given hundreds of millions to spend on players. If he can't get Nasri, he'll just have to 'manage' . Isn't that his job ?
HellasLEAF
Well-Known Member
If we had some type of guarantee that Silva would not get injured all season I would say forget Nasri as we don't need him right now like most think. Especially if Tevez stays one last season as he or Aguero are both capable of playing in behind the striker with great effect.
Sign Nasri on a free next summer.
Sign Nasri on a free next summer.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.