Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
We did last season when Kelechi replaced him for the knock-out stages.The idea of keeping him around only for domestic games is ridiculous - no other team in the world does this.
We did last season when Kelechi replaced him for the knock-out stages.The idea of keeping him around only for domestic games is ridiculous - no other team in the world does this.
We did last season when Kelechi replaced him for the knock-out stages.
Nasir's main weakness is his attitude/ego.
Good point, apart from the fact it's completely and utterly not true!
You sure? I thought that's how they had split it between the two.
We did last season when Kelechi replaced him for the knock-out stages.
He is also foreign. They may have a differing attitude towards questions which are thought irrelivant
Why?
It's not intentionally misleading. Nasri could have been back for the second leg of the R16 match and was certainly expected back for the QF. I accept it wasn't a simple 'him or him' choice but it was a calculated decision.That is an intentionally misleading post and you know it.