SatOnTheWall
Well-Known Member
Don’t tell me that twat has an opinion on Pink Floyd. He’s wrong, whatever he says.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
New PL Commercial rule passed (pg4) | City rumoured to be questioning the legality
- Thread starter mancity dan
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
About the weather in Newcastle, Newcastle being isolated from the rest of the country and where Sunderland fans live?Here we go Jordan on talksport talking about this now ..
Here we go Jordan on talksport talking about this now ..
Weird he didn't mention that premier ffp already have a fair value for teams who have associated clubs!? Which in theory would stop us buying Savio for a few million!
eyalluvitt
Well-Known Member
I once had a Ploughmans lunch (he was furious) in the pub near Bamburgh castle and Marlon from Emmerdale was enjoying a pint in the snug, the barmaid said he was a regular and has a holiday home nearby.Has this tread turned into the Newcastle Tourist Board thread ?
It should not bother Bayern - not only because we aren't in the EPL.Calling @Maldeika to the thread :)
Edit: Incidentally, I did analysis of commercial income vs broadcast income a couple of years ago, on the grounds that the more successful a club and its league was, the more a sponsor would be paying for sponsorship. There were four outliers: Bayern, PSG and Shaktar (iirc) who got more commercial income than their success and "appeal" suggested they should and Liverpool who were making less. I think I will update it for the last info.
Bayern's commercial partners are totally independent from each other - and all of them have less than 8 % - and together 25%. I am pretty sure that Audi would not pay a special sum extra when it is the other 92% that profit as much from it as they would... Same with Adidas... That is just not logical...
spacecadet
Well-Known Member
You should be in the middle of two fallow years. But then Dortmund can always be trusted to shit their Wolseleys.It should not bother Bayern - not only because we aren't in the EPL.
Bayern's commercial partners are totally independent from each other - and all of them have less than 8 % - and together 25%. I am pretty sure that Audi would not pay a special sum extra when it is the other 92% that profit as much from it as they would... Same with Adidas... That is just not logical...
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 15,246
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Is this the rules City are taking the PL to court over?
Yes.Is this the rules City are taking the PL to court over?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.