Wasn’t a pen, no goalscoring opportunity was prevented illegally. Those who think it was need to learn the rules
So Ederson headbuts Wilson whilst waiting for a corner, no penalty?
Wasn’t a pen, no goalscoring opportunity was prevented illegally. Those who think it was need to learn the rules
Or when they put nine past IpswichAsk him was it boring when United were winning 13 Prem titles out of 20.
Fair one. It can be looked at both ways I suppose. One of those scenarios where there will always be a grey area.If Ederson deliberately brough him down it was a Pen, doesn't matter how far away the ball is and he was the nearest Newcastle player to the ball. I think they didn't give it as it was an off the ball coming together with both players carrying on natural momentum and no foul by either.
Yeah I hear that as well...Funny that, I don't recall Fulham Everton, Aston Villa ect spening £100m plus back in those days!Get the “league isnt as strong as it used to be” a lot. Only from United fans as they can’t accept that we may just be better than them in their pomp.
If the ball is not in play its a red card but no penaltySo Ederson headbuts Wilson whilst waiting for a corner, no penalty?
If the ball is not in play its a red card but no penalty
Probably the strongest premier league ever. Even Norwich and Watford have much bigger budgets than the vast majority of La Liga, Serie A and the BundesligaGet the “league isnt as strong as it used to be” a lot. Only from United fans as they can’t accept that we may just be better than them in their pomp.
Plus, I doubt Ederson would be that far out of his goal ;-)That penalty decision - if that happened in another part of the pitch, say mid-field, would the ref have blown for a foul and free kick ? No, because Cancelo had won the ball, was in total control of the ball, and play had transitioned to the next phase. Once the ball had gone out of play he might have gone back and booked the player for his challenge but he would have let play go on. It was effectively an 'off the ball' incident.
Then it would be bothWhat if the ball is in play?
Then it would be both
damn. forgot Mahrez is leaving us.When will the Afcon boys leave??
I would have thought play Boxing day or 27th then leave for Africa 10 days before 1st game
Surely that's got to make a big big difference
Are you mistaking me for someone who was arguing with you?So today was a pen then?
Are you mistaking me for someone who was arguing with you?
Wouldn’t have been outraged at all if it was given but I can also see why they didn’t give it
I think if we can win all our games up to Arsenal, we might be clear of Liverpool too.
Chelsea and Liverpool both play each other on Jan 2.
We absolutely need to keep winning throughout Xmas.
Well that’s deliberately endangering an opponent, that’s a whole different ball gameSo Ederson headbuts Wilson whilst waiting for a corner, no penalty?
damn. forgot Mahrez is leaving us.
Foul isThat penalty decision - if that happened in another part of the pitch, say mid-field, would the ref have blown for a foul and free kick ? No, because Cancelo had won the ball, was in total control of the ball, and play had transitioned to the next phase. Once the ball had gone out of play he might have gone back and booked the player for his challenge but he would have let play go on. It was effectively an 'off the ball' incident.
foul law says careless or reckless is a foul. On out reason I can think as to why it wasn’t given was cancello had ball so another phase of playFair one. It can be looked at both ways I suppose. One of those scenarios where there will always be a grey area.