Metalartin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2015
- Messages
- 12,373
I was hoping this would mean our press would finally start acknowledging the difference between state owned clubs and privately owned clubs and private wealth and state money. Until I read this:
Isn't the PIF still run with state money? I'm not sure I understand how they convinced them that it has nothing to do with their government tbh. Not that I agree with the FFP rules, PSG are owned and controlled by a state already.
Also, £300m? I thought Ashley was holding out for much more than that.
Approval from the Premier League could possibly come in the next 24 hours after a consortium proved the Saudi state would not have control of the club.
Instead the Public Investment Fund (PIF), which is set to provide 80% of funds for the £300m deal, will be seen as separate to the state and therefore allow the takeover to pass the Premier League owners’ and directors’ test.
Isn't the PIF still run with state money? I'm not sure I understand how they convinced them that it has nothing to do with their government tbh. Not that I agree with the FFP rules, PSG are owned and controlled by a state already.
Also, £300m? I thought Ashley was holding out for much more than that.
Last edited: