Cheadle_hulmeBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 Oct 2012
- Messages
- 19,399
We won nothing for years. I want us to win every trophy we can. Why would anyone not want that
As it has turned out, we had no need to rest anyone in the Q/F 1st leg. Now we only have 6 games to play instead of 9.We just lost to Spurs over two legs after resting players in the first game. Decisions, mistakes, misses etc will always happen. Making concious decisions to play a full strength team in an FA Cup game then resting some others for a CL QF game a few days later is within our control.
Every season the club should focus on winning the League Cup (because it's over by March), then the League and Chumps League only after that.
It was the FA Cup that screwed us with an intense fixture list in the latter half of the season under Pellegrini and now under Pep.
So win the FA Cup this year (which I genuinely wanted us to win anyway this season, because we haven't won it for a while now), and then play only reserve team players from next year onwards.
So sacking the FA Cup as a strategy, should guarantee us a high chance of winning at least two trophies a season whilst Pep is here.
The League Cup isn't without issues. 1- It's a midweek competition so if you're complaining about playing every three days then there is one easy solution for a few weeks respite. 2- Getting to the final meant re-arranging the United game. The timing of that game meant we had to manage the squad before a tough run of league fixtures (Palace, Spurs, United).
It's still an extra 5/6 games, it still involves a period of playing every few days and it can cause a fixture pile up at the business end of the season. We've won it four times, shown it more respect than any other team in the past twenty years. Time to play the kids with a sprinkling of seniors that need minutes.
Sounding very Raggish to sack off the FA Cup. We have to go for everything and if we don't win everything then fuck it. That's what I pay my money for, to see City play to win as The Boys in Blue song goes.
A manager has to balance the demands of 4 competitions and hence assembles a squad of players and utilises them across the season so that you don't always play your strongest 11 quite simply because if you do that to your team, it weakens and players break down and get injured.I know what Pep said and it's bollocks. Tactics would never have you pick Delph at left back and KDB on the bench. Never, ever, ever.
No.As someone who witnessed the success of the Mercer/Allison years and has enjoyed our current success, who else would sacrifice a cup or two to see our young kids make the first team?
I would.
Only this.You can't pick and choose, play to win in everything!
That the quadruple isn’t going to happen and play reserves and youth players in the two domestic cups. It’s been a heck of a ride and something the club can be extremely proud of.
But we cannot put ourselves in a position again where we play a full strength team in the FA Cup one day and have to rest players a few days later in a CL quarter final.
I know how some will react to this post, especially those that dislike the CL. But when domestic cups become detrimental to success in bigger competitions then something has to give.
How about us resting players in the Chamions League games and going all out for the domestic treble.
We will still be in the following years CL if we adopted that policy every season, and the star players wouldn't have to traipse all over Europe for midweek games that are basically just for the benefit of the armchair viewers.
No.
Our team is winning trophies, 'AT THE MOMENT'. We need to keep on winning trophies as no one can predict when this will end.
It is better to have a few frustrated youth players than 40,000+ fans bemoaning the fact of knowing that, " If only we had played a stronger team, we would have won that match/trophy!"
No, we should go all out to win everything we can. Youth will get their opportunity.
A manager has to balance the demands of 4 competitions and hence assembles a squad of players and utilises them across the season so that you don't always play your strongest 11 quite simply because if you do that to your team, it weakens and players break down and get injured.
I agreed with your initial argument: Competing on 4 fronts means compromise somewhere down the line, but I think it's right to accept that risk. Stress the squad and they will grow.
Liverpool may end up through limited objectives of winning the league and Champions League. It's a distinct possibility now, but City and Liverpool were in different positions. I think Pep has managed City brilliantly this season. At times sitting in my armchair, I disagreed but when he explains himself (Spurs away) I understood what he was doing (doesn't make it right. He might have what if thoughts).
It's a very legitimate question to ask if City had adopted Liverpool's strategy of prioritising two competitions, would we be better off now. I think we would, but I am glad we did what we did. We need to be ambitious and we will have developed by doing so.
I thought it was a great question you raised but I disagree with your Delph and KDB comments. KDB is vital to City. We simply cannot run him into the ground. Delph is also a good player with games under his belt...see last season.