Niall Quinn

[ancoats]

I agree with the sentiment but Crooks clearly hasn't done his numbers on Aguero. Unless he means in all competitions his PL totals are 24,26,17,12 and 23. His appearances with goals scored make that 17 look impressive and the rest also bar the 12, but it's lazy writing as ever from him.

yep he's wrong but i feel he meant well and the record of aguero in all comp's for man city aguero is great and with injury and playing time to goals it looks even better. in the 5 seasons and what manchester city have won the PFA awards have over looked the managers and players even in pellegrini double winning seasons got over looked how aguero or silva never got a sniff is a joke

 

[yeah whatever !!]

Stardust means cunts. Hope that clears it up for you both?

I thought it was shreks dandruff.

 

[BlueTG]

I thought it was shreks dandruff.

Either that, or just a collective atmosphere of concern of Giggs' whereabouts from everyone inside the swamp being misread

 

[billfromthehill]

Sniif sniff - are you for real. On here nearly every day and probably been to more games than you will ever see??

Is your dad bigger than my dad now?

 

[Bellamy's Caddy]

yep he's wrong but i feel he meant well and the record of aguero in all comp's for man city aguero is great and with injury and playing time to goals it looks even better. in the 5 seasons and what manchester city have won the PFA awards have over looked the managers and players even in pellegrini double winning seasons got over looked how aguero or silva never got a sniff is a joke

Over the weekend I saw a lot on social media comparing Drogba and Aguero's stats: Drogba 254 games, 104 goals
Aguero 151 games, 105 goals.
Most neutrals that were commenting were saying they preferred Drogba to Aguero. I appreciate it is social media and to take those things with a pinch of salt but as you have mentioned, we have won a lot in the last 5 years and also have the best record for finishing in the top 2. For no one connected to City to have won any of the big prizes, or at least be nominated is a disgrace and quite frankly it points to something more sinister at play.

I like Quinn and having met him and discussed City with him not long ago I have no doubt he's still got a lot of time for the club and the fans. But that "stardust" comment does highlight the difference in the coverage united have received over their summer spending compared to ours. There seems to be this glorification of united's latest overhaul. They've got the special one (only available because he got sacked by Chelsea), they've re-signed the world's most expensive player (who they sold for a nominal fee only a few years earlier) oh and they've signed Zlatan (a 35 year old, blocking Rashford's game time) yet somehow the money in all this plays second to the "Manchester United" myth, that this is all great for the game. City on the other hand continue to be labelled big spending etc and whilst Pep has received a lot of attention, there is an undercurrent of a willingness for him to fail. Not many pundits praised the win against Stoke, instead preferring to talk about the result being flattering. While the wankfest over united's Friday night game was quite sickening.

The contrast in attitudes towards City as opposed to other clubs is frustrating, but it's something we are used to and even if the media coverage or individual accolades don't acknowledge City it is an incredible time to be a blue and the football we play is a joy to watch. Without going all Keegan I will love it if Aguero hits 25+ goals this season and we win the league. It may not be what the pundits want but it will do for me!

 

[old blue]

We win away from home 4-1 at Stoke, one of the hardest places to go & get a result especially for one of the top clubs as Stoke always seem to raise their game against the big clubs. They win at home against Southampton who are being weakened by the season as the big clubs continually take their best players. This summer they have lost Mane, Pelle & Wanyama with nobody of any note coming in to replace them, yet their win is hailed as a great result. It is obvious to a village idiot which is the better result.

Not forgetting their fan base is mostly the aforementioned village idiots.

 

[GeorgeHeslop'sTackle.]

Can't stand Quinn to be honest. Never have been able to since 1994.

We we getting beat 5-0 at the swamp, when the television camera suddenly panned onto the centre circle, in injury time, and captured Nial, who was obviously more than happy to see the funny side of the whole thing, laughing like a drain. (with Brian McClair).

 

[warpig]

Just said of our performance at Stoke yesterday, that "it's a good start for City, but not the stardust we saw at Old Trafford".

Anyone still allow themselves to have fond memories of this berk?

I actually agree with what he said. We looked very good in parts on Saturday. But equally very disjointed in parts .
Well get better the more the players train under pep, which was his gist.

 

[Sergio Picasso Aguero]

Niall Quinn, Steve McManaman and Danny Mills are the City representatives in the media. Fucking hell we've had some massive twats play for us.

 

[Phil1]

I actually agree with what he said. We looked very good in parts on Saturday. But equally very disjointed in parts .
Well get better the more the players train under pep, which was his gist.

It wasn't though. He said we were fortunate whilst in the same breath lauded utd for some supposed 'stardust' on offer in their 2-0 home win against a terrible Southampton.