1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 15,512
They're looking for Ian Tough I suspect.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
bigstanhibbert
Well-Known Member
Are you McShakespeare?It’s a mockery of a travesty of two shams.
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
It is he, it is him, it is I.Are you McShakespeare?
Oh noblest of temperament is cast upon the rock of mockery and derision, through evil, not of her making, but of forces within her bedchamber that took that trust and in return, brought treachery most foul upon her house.
Now Jackal's surround, with intent to harm most extreme and who’s focus shall rest, not on the wicked who begat the tempest, but instead to one who failed, or perhaps refused, to see the darkness within his soul, as love makes blind to all mischief from those ensconced within the hearts of men, that can hath consequences edged with vengeful and destructive objectives, from those who wish annihilation of both reputation and soul.
Last edited:
bigstanhibbert
Well-Known Member
Simple yes or no, would have been OKIt is he, it is him, it is I.
Oh noblest of temperament, is cast upon the rock of mockery and derision, through evil, not of her making, but of forces within her bedchamber, that took that trust and in return, brought treachery most foul upon her house.
Now Jackal's surround, with intent to harm most extreme and who’s focus shall rest, not on the wicked who begat the tempest, but instead to one who failed, or indeed refused, to see the darkness within his soul, as love makes blind to all, mischief from those ensconced within the hearts of men, that can hath consequences edged with vengeful and destructive objectives from those who wish annihilation of both reputation and soul.
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
I am legally bound to go on a bit. It’s in my BM contract.Simple yes or no, would have been OK
bigstanhibbert
Well-Known Member
who supplied your contract @gordondaviesmoustache ? Is it true @Ric pays you by the word?I am legally bound to go on a bit. It’s in my BM contract.
hilts
Well-Known Member
5 English pence per word but @Ric had a coherence clause sneakily added to the small print @Magicpole earnt 10p in the last tax yearwho supplied your contract @gordondaviesmoustache ? Is it true @Ric pays you by the word?
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
It’s a start.5 English pence per word but @Ric had a coherence clause sneakily added to the small print @Magicpole earnt 10p in the last tax year
Magicpole
Well-Known Member
Yes, he knew the very survival of the site depended upon my contribution. He’s smart. So am I, this reply alone with pay for a bag of cans.who supplied your contract @gordondaviesmoustache ? Is it true @Ric pays you by the word?