A
A
Anonymous
Guest
I know we're wealthy but why are we paying £15m for him when he can leave for £1.5m in June?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
*singingtheblues*
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,276
Because we can!
blue dallas
Well-Known Member
no we cant he' contracted till june 2010.Immaculate Pasta said:I know we're wealthy but why are we paying £15m for him when he can leave for £1.5m in June?
paddystyle
Well-Known Member
because he can't he has a contract to 2010Immaculate Pasta said:I know we're wealthy but why are we paying £15m for him when he can leave for £1.5m in June?
Blue Mooner
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Jun 2005
- Messages
- 3,133
*singingtheblues* said:Because we can!
Because perhaps we want to win something this season, famous last words, but we are still in the UEFA cup in case you hadn't noticed.
Istanbul, Istanbul we are coming !
*singingtheblues*
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2008
- Messages
- 2,276
But seriously, his presence is exactly what we need now, Kompany back to center half, and De Jong in the middle.
We might scrape into Europe next year with him in the squad, without him we wouldn't have a hope in hell.
I think it's worth sacrificing some small change!
We might scrape into Europe next year with him in the squad, without him we wouldn't have a hope in hell.
I think it's worth sacrificing some small change!
and besides he just made a verbal agreement to sign a prolonged contract with them..blue dallas said:no we cant he' contracted till june 2010.Immaculate Pasta said:I know we're wealthy but why are we paying £15m for him when he can leave for £1.5m in June?
and we need players now not only in the summer
bizzbo
Well-Known Member
it's been reported he had a 1.5m escape clause that kicked in this summer,
but
a: he had already verbally agreed to sign a new contract. don't know wether this may have affected the enforcibility of that clause
and
b: that's just a starting point. you can bet clubs would have bid much higher.
but
a: he had already verbally agreed to sign a new contract. don't know wether this may have affected the enforcibility of that clause
and
b: that's just a starting point. you can bet clubs would have bid much higher.
hackster321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2008
- Messages
- 96
why oh why is everyone so concerned at the price the sheik is paying for players!! its HIS money after all.......at least we are not putting the club into financial debt buying players as other clubs do!! 32 mil for berbasnob springs to mind!
Just be happy we are buying class players and stop being soooo concerned about prices FFS!
Just be happy we are buying class players and stop being soooo concerned about prices FFS!