Me too. In fact i'm calling it a conspiracy if they do ban him. As it strengthens them without him :)No investigation would mean that the FA allow this behaviour on the pitch which would set a bad precedent.
TBH I would prefer he didnt get banned for our game against them as he is shite.
He is shite but he is also a large part of their plan b and he is a thug,i'd be happy if he got bannedNo investigation would mean that the FA allow this behaviour on the pitch which would set a bad precedent.
TBH I would prefer he didnt get banned for our game against them as he is shite.
We shouldn't complain guys- as long as Lukaku is in the United team they'll suffer at the moment. If he is suspended they may have to play Martial or Rashford up top which IMO makes them more likely to score. Kompany and the Otter can pocket Lukaku quite easily, Martial's pace will be harder to manage.
Petulance- is that meant to be some kind of mitigation?
Lifting your foot off the ground TWICE to kick an opponent is violent conduct whatever the motivation.
It's a load of bollocks. It's not important why he did it.Dermot Gallagher, ex referee and sky pundit reckons it was an act of petulance rather than violent conduct so therefore unlikely to end in a ban for Lukaku, so by that defence I could smash some one around the head but plead it was an act of petulance "M'Lud"