No action against Lukaku

Gallagher has a point when he says it was more petulant then violent/brutality. Sean Goater agreed with him too.

Having said that it could have gone the other way, certainly is debatable.

No he doesn't. The word petulant isn't mentioned anywhere in the laws. So he's talking drivel....
 
Gallagher has a point when he says it was more petulant then violent/brutality. Sean Goater agreed with him too.

Having said that it could have gone the other way, certainly is debatable.
Graham Poll says that’s bollocks.

United players have a history of petulant kick outs though, remember that shit **** Beckham screwing us over in the World Cup as well.

Only good news is that Lukaku is shite and ended up as the right wing back last game. I fancy Sane to do him.
 
So,at least a precedent has now been set for any future,similar,incidents where a player aims a kick at an opponents bollocks.
 
A precedent has been set. I hope Watford petulantly kicks them around. Let's see what the refs will make of it when bollocks are being kicked, petulantly of course.
 
Surely it’s in our best interest that Lukaku plays in the derby, he has no ability to retain the ball and there key strategy will be counter attack with the ball up to the front man and set plays of course. I for one hope he doesn’t get banned because basically he’s shit

If Kompany plays he'll have him in his back pocket.
 
Gallagher has a point when he says it was more petulant then violent/brutality. Sean Goater agreed with him too.

Having said that it could have gone the other way, certainly is debatable.

Why does petulance become a defence when you deliberately kick someone in the bollocks......twice. There is the injustice that you then scored from that which can happen in football but the right thing should have happened today. The lack of coverage is why the FA have done nothing about it. Niasse got banned because they was hell bent on banning someone for diving and MOTD and sky sports drummed it home. They have done the same last year with Aguero, no complaints from West Ham or the manager at that time but showing it on loop calling for a ban has a big impact. No consistency at all.
 
We'll give refs the benefit of the doubt and say they miss stuff, fine, but stuff like this is fucking scandalous, its on fucking video of him kicking out not even once but more than that as he couldn't connect properly the first time and still nothing. Ridiculous but no surprise, they always get away with this stuff, like when Pogba threw Allen to the floor etc.
According to someone on ragcafe it was a 'get off me' kind of move not violent. They really are an entertaining lot.
 
Sean Goater agreed with him too.
grammar_nazi_by_tatsumimitsuki-d595g4e.jpg
 
A precedent has been set. I hope Watford petulantly kicks them around. Let's see what the refs will make of it when bollocks are being kicked, petulantly of course.

It goes without saying that players from other teams than the Rags will be straight red carded or banned after video evidence for similar offences.

The FA are a disgraceful and corrupt organisation who clearly want to keep the Rags relevant for purely commercial reasons .
 
Absolutely scandalous decision. He kicked a player not once but twice and no action is taken. I guarantee if that would have been one of our players it would have been a three game ban.
 
So in the run up to the last derby at the old toilet there was a witch hunt to get aguero banned for that game (still won rag ****s) now in the run up to this seasons game at the old toilet no action was deemed necessary for kickaku kicking a player twice. Don't think this ends here I really expect refs to go to town on us next 2 games and make sure we miss important players at the swamp. I just hope other clubs will point to the kickaku assault if any of there players are charged with a similar offence. Fucking scandalous.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top