I've sat in the North Stand for 20 years now. Always been envious of people who get to go up the 'hamster runs', so I'm absolutely delighted to get to go in entrance X instead of Z now. I miss City Square but it'll be worth it in time.
The next loop is from Little Hulton stopping at -:Does the club know that not all fans come from Stockport or South Manchester?
All depends on the method of procurement.What’s your take on the on the North stand expansion?
A construction contractor hasn’t been officially confirmed yet.(stand corrected on that)
Taking everything into consideration, how difficult will it be for the construction contractor to price this challenging and lengthy build correctly?
Aren’t the build costs supposed to be in the region of £300mill upwards already, with an unforeseen delays or issues?
Dont know mate, Im not a QS and I dont know what RIBA stages they have left to complete as regards design. My guess is it would be similar figures to the new Coop Arena. Its obviously smaller but its always much more complicated modifying an existing structure than building a new one (unless you're building something unique). So I would guess more like £350m rather than the earmarked £300m. Buts its a bit of a finger in the air without knowing the details.
What’s your take on the on the North stand expansion?
A construction contractor hasn’t been officially confirmed yet.(stand corrected on that)
Taking everything into consideration, how difficult will it be for the construction contractor to price this challenging and lengthy build correctly?
Aren’t the build costs supposed to be in the region of £300mill upwards already, with an unforeseen delays or issues?
I’m sure I read somewhere last week that it’s 100 weeks away from opening.Sorry to ask an obvious question but is it one year or two before this development opens?
Purely scale and complexity, plus the shift in raw materials costs. Prefabricated structural steel has increased by around 20% in the last 12 months, labour costs have increased, concrete is still about 15% more than a year or so ago. Some things have fallen a bit from their peaks but nowhere near enough to offset the price increases of the core components.What do you base that guess on, out of interest?
Does the club know that not all fans come from Stockport or South Manchester?
I dont confess to be an expert in these matters, but the NEC 3 framework is pretty much like the old PPP system that they use to have years ago for government funded infrastructure. The main issue is that it can become a deal where the only real winners are the commercial lawyers.All depends on the method of procurement.
If it's Design & Build then the chances are the tendered costs will be significantly higher than £300 million, but with City having a degree of certainty with the costs, barring 'unforeseen' extras that could not reasonably have been allowed for.
If it's a Traditional JCT Contract then the tendered price will be much lower, but with the very real and, in fact, probable, chance of costs escalating and then spiralling out of control.
Large construction projects seem to be moving towards an NEC Contract, these days, whereupon the two parties agree a target cost, say £300 million, and then if the works actually cost £350 million, both City and the Contractor share equally the £50 million 'hit'; i.e. City pay £25 million and so does the Contractor. However, if the costs actually came in at £250 million, they both share the saving, so City would pay them £25 million above the £250 million as a nice little bonus for keeping the costs to £50 million below the target cost. It works really well, because it incentivises the Contractor to keep costs down rather than escalate them.