nmc
Well-Known Member
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
With a pair of pliers and a strong grip….
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
Exactly what I was wondering about. Transferring that tension whilst the cables are under load is a very impressive engineering solution.
It will be like 9/11 when half theI would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
It should be for our hardcore only, no SK postcode, no ticketIf they get this right (which they won't) they should make this new end the cheapest part of the stadium but make it accesible to long serving and vocal fans. They could even sell the season tickets on a points basis. They could address so many issues at once. Atmosphere and ticket price unrest. The two are almost hand-in-hand because it's the working class fans who make the noise and who are the most disillusioned. Also the PR would be superb: club of the people and all that.
What an opportunity they have. They blew it once with the south stand extension and I bet they blow this one again.
I would hate to be the guy disconnecting and reconnecting those 7 catenary tension cables to the new anchor.
Interesting observation. What are your thoughts on the quadpods?
Well done @supercity88 and @Coatigan for their informal way of informing us what is happening with the roof, very helpful work they guys, keep up the good work.
@jrb is allowed to have his opinion on what is thinks is right, he not having a go at anyone on here. If he thinks the club are doing wrong he is allowed to say it.
Just like I don't like the fins on the hotel or the roof on the fan zone, I am allowed to post about it. It's not up to certain individuals to tell us to go elsewhere
Like a majority of City fans, we were sold on the idea of City having a home end like The Kop or Yellow Wall and that is what a vast majority of city fans want... At no time with the club questionnaire were we told that they were going to shove a GA+ section in the middle of it.
So until the club says that they not doing this @jrb and the 1894 are within their rights to have a go at the club
Well done @supercity88 and @Coatigan for their informal way of informing us what is happening with the roof, very helpful work they guys, keep up the good work.
@jrb is allowed to have his opinion on what is thinks is right, he not having a go at anyone on here. If he thinks the club are doing wrong he is allowed to say it.
Just like I don't like the fins on the hotel or the roof on the fan zone, I am allowed to post about it. It's not up to certain individuals to tell us to go elsewhere
Like a majority of City fans, we were sold on the idea of City having a home end like The Kop or Yellow Wall and that is what a vast majority of city fans want... At no time with the club questionnaire were we told that they were going to shove a GA+ section in the middle of it.
So until the club says that they not doing this @jrb and the 1894 are within their rights to have a go at the club