I wouldn't be surprised if it's standard for them to ask everyone they engage to sign the NDA and they are told they can relay pretty much all of the meeting, barring maybe commercially sensitive info.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
North Stand Construction Discussion
- Thread starter awest
- Start date
I wouldn't be surprised if it's standard for them to ask everyone they engage to sign the NDA and they are told they can relay pretty much all of the meeting, barring maybe commercially sensitive info.
Entirely possible, but why would 1894 make a bit of a deal of that if it were standard.
Not that I'm saying that was their intention, just the outcome of the tweet.
Possibly because the only info they have been given is they need to sign an NDA? I'd imagine it's not something they are used to being asked to do. But we are all guessing.Entirely possible, but why would 1894 make a bit of a deal of that if it were standard.
Not that I'm saying that was their intention, just the outcome of the tweet.
It sounds like City are ready to reveal firm proposals for NSL2, and they don't want those details being made public yet. If that's true, that puts the fan representatives in an awkward position, as the fans will want to know what has been discussed at the meeting.Entirely possible, but why would 1894 make a bit of a deal of that if it were standard.
Not that I'm saying that was their intention, just the outcome of the tweet.
It sounds like City are ready to reveal firm proposals for NSL2, and they don't want those details being made public yet. If that's true, that puts the fan representatives in an awkward position, as the fans will want to know what has been discussed at the meeting.
It does. But should also make them feel at least partly like the club will genuinely engage with them. And is also understandable from the club's point, as there will be quite a few potentially sensitive items. After all, while a fan group representing fans, they are also supporters of the club and not in conflict with them etc. If you say similar has happened previously, then it won't be a surprise or new to them either, they'll know how to deal with it like adults.
It does. But should also make them feel at least partly like the club will genuinely engage with them. And is also understandable from the club's point, as there will be quite a few potentially sensitive items. After all, while a fan group representing fans, they are also supporters of the club and not in conflict with them etc. If you say similar has happened previously, then it won't be a surprise or new to them either, they'll know how to deal with it like adults.
I appreciate we're all jumping the gun, but if Alex can't post the answers to the questions we asked him to ask the club at the meeting, fair enough.
I've been there myself, and I know how the club works at the meetings.
I appreciate we're all jumping the gun, but if Alex can't post the answers to the questions we asked him to ask the club at the meeting, fair enough.
I've been there myself, and I know how the club works at the meetings.
I don't imagine the club will want Everything kept under wraps. But likely safest agree an NDA on the whole thing that try be specific in what is or isn't covered. They will likely be ok with some information being shared. Goes without saying all guessing.
Hopefully the club will tell the CMR, 1894, etc, they can disclose to City fans some of the options the club are still looking at or have decided for NSL2?I don't imagine the club will want Everything kept under wraps. But likely safest agree an NDA on the whole thing that try be specific in what is or isn't covered. They will likely be ok with some information being shared. Goes without saying all guessing.