North Stand Construction Discussion

Fanzine, Museum, Souvenir Store, Offices.

PXL-20250422-164523500-MP-3.jpg


PXL-20250422-164423565-MP-2.jpg


PXL-20250422-164340861-MP-2.jpg


PXL-20250422-164647011-MP-3.jpg


PXL-20250422-164729496-MP-3.jpg


PXL-20250422-164828089-MP-2.jpg


PXL-20250422-164912176-MP-2.jpg


PXL-20250422-164947931-MP-2.jpg

Excellent photos.

I wasn't too keen on the proposals initially as the commercial/hotel obviously mask the stadium itself from that approach.

But alternative options wouldn't have been as good in terms of their location/functionality and you can see how good City Square will be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jrb
I've got a final set of pictures to post of the right side of the stand. I didn't have time to post the pictures last night.
 
It's part of the temporary end beam supports. The completed east side one can be seen here (a previous jrb photo from a couple of pages back).

View attachment 153964
Yes I know. But your picture looks a pukka job whereas the other one looks a botch up. Seem to have used loads of plywood instead of a steel connector?
 
Yes I know. But your picture looks a pukka job whereas the other one looks a botch up. Seem to have used loads of plywood instead of a steel connector?
Yes but look how neatly the plywood packers are cut!
 
I still don't fully understand those yellow temporary connection pieces in those locations on the outer beams. Unless the columns themselves arent permanent, why have them there, why not just bear the beam onto a permanent connection and not have to jenga these ones and replace them later.

Unless the height of connections and tolerances are not predictable enough, and they have to almost settle it onto a temporary piece to then make that piece the right length. Which maybe the ply packers are doing in increment.

Anyone else got thoughts here? Been bugging me for some time now.
 
I still don't fully understand those yellow temporary connection pieces in those locations on the outer beams. Unless the columns themselves arent permanent, why have them there, why not just bear the beam onto a permanent connection and not have to jenga these ones and replace them later.

Unless the height of connections and tolerances are not predictable enough, and they have to almost settle it onto a temporary piece to then make that piece the right length. Which maybe the ply packers are doing in increment.

Anyone else got thoughts here? Been bugging me for some time now.
I thought that maybe the remaining steelwork is just to support the glazing(?) that forms the ends of the stand once the beams and roof load is taken up by the quod-pods?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top