North Stand Construction Discussion

Great video! I never thought the roof was wonky, but can’t understand why the ground-staff aren’t working around the clock to get the pitch ready.
I think they’ve started! From memory in the past they’ve needed to kill the old grass first. I think the stuff under the covers was done before they went down. The other end is just catching up before it gets stripped
 
Back to Vonky Wonky roof
The roof has a curve, the metal purlins are all straight and this is the issue of why it appears wrong
There are 11 bays, ignoring the end not parallel ones
The centre bay purlin follows the line of the east bays ( orange 1 to 5) which is at odd with the west bays (yellow 1 to 5) so the middle truss ( C ) has the east purlin attachment higher than the west one this is what causes the roof to look out of line Once the translucent cladding is added it will be less visible

Image 7-16-25 at 3.46 PM.jpegRoof.jpg
 
I already don't like the sails :)
Nope me neither, for some reason didn’t think it would on the inside of the square I thought it was the other sides .
Do you know if the Sails going on the commercial block ? Or just hotel ? .
I guess time will tell but I can see the white sails being all nasty in a year with birds shite etc
 
Whilst they are nothing ground breaking I don't mind the sails myself and think they might look better when more of them are fitted. The roof is clearly A-symmetrical but I'm wondering if the sky walk and other bits 'n' pieces yet to be fitted might create an uneven load, in which case the A-symmetry is intentional and will even out later in the build.
 
Back to Vonky Wonky roof
The roof has a curve, the metal purlins are all straight and this is the issue of why it appears wrong
There are 11 bays, ignoring the end not parallel ones
The centre bay purlin follows the line of the east bays ( orange 1 to 5) which is at odd with the west bays (yellow 1 to 5) so the middle truss ( C ) has the east purlin attachment higher than the west one this is what causes the roof to look out of line Once the translucent cladding is added it will be less visible

View attachment 163107View attachment 163108
I doubt if anybody will notice inside the stadium.
 
Back to Vonky Wonky roof
The roof has a curve, the metal purlins are all straight and this is the issue of why it appears wrong
There are 11 bays, ignoring the end not parallel ones
The centre bay purlin follows the line of the east bays ( orange 1 to 5) which is at odd with the west bays (yellow 1 to 5) so the middle truss ( C ) has the east purlin attachment higher than the west one this is what causes the roof to look out of line Once the translucent cladding is added it will be less visible

View attachment 163107View attachment 163108
Na mate, it is off.

I get what you are saying, and there is an element of that for sure. Particularly from the air, a perception discrepancy.

But ultimately roof beams of that bay should be level, and the west one is higher than the east. And as such that bay isn't flat, as it should be. More evident from the ground than the air.

For now...
 
Last edited:
Na mate, it is off.

I get what you are saying, and there is an element of that for sure. Particularly from the air, a perception discrepancy.

But ultimately roof beams of that bay should be level, and the west one is higher than the east. And as such that bay isn't flat, as it should be.

For now...
Its a shame no-one from Sisk or City read this thread. If they did they could either (a) explain why it appears to be wonky or (b) thank the drone pilots for pointing out what they otherwise wouldn't have been aware of so they can fix it before its too late!
 
Back to Vonky Wonky roof
The roof has a curve, the metal purlins are all straight and this is the issue of why it appears wrong
There are 11 bays, ignoring the end not parallel ones
The centre bay purlin follows the line of the east bays ( orange 1 to 5) which is at odd with the west bays (yellow 1 to 5) so the middle truss ( C ) has the east purlin attachment higher than the west one this is what causes the roof to look out of line Once the translucent cladding is added it will be less visible

View attachment 163107View attachment 163108
Perhaps it could be due to different tensions in the cables? I assume that they will adjust it if it is an issue.
 
Na mate, it is off.

I get what you are saying, and there is an element of that for sure. Particularly from the air, a perception discrepancy.

But ultimately roof beams of that bay should be level, and the west one is higher than the east. And as such that bay isn't flat, as it should be.

For now...
It’s only the purlins at the end where the translucent panels are going in. Further back they look more horizontal to me. The end of the roof beam is an extension piece isn’t it? Something to do with that in my opinion.

Look at @Gordyola ‘s picture above, the purlins in that bay aren’t at the same angle.
 
Perhaps it could be due to different tensions in the cables? I assume that they will adjust it if it is an issue.
I would think adjusting it to that level, now that the purlins are in, would be a bit difficult. More like they pack it before the platform goes on.

There could be a practical reason for it being askew, i.e deliberately leaving one side higher so whem installing the platform ring, there is only one point of contact to align, rather than more. And then the weight of the platform is taken up by the higher beam, while they align the other points of contact. Potentially.
 
It’s only the purlins at the end where the translucent panels are going in. Further back they look more horizontal to me. The end of the roof beam is an extension piece isn’t it? Something to do with that in my opinion.

Look at @Gordyola ‘s picture above, the purlins in that bay aren’t at the same angle.
The purnins being off isn't an issue. The beams not being level would be the bigger concern. IF.. it ends up so.
 
The purnins being off isn't an issue. The beams not being level would be the bigger concern. IF.. it ends up so.
Yes but if it’s just the end extension piece it’s probably no huge issue. The east sided one of that bay looks a little low, but does the walkway go directly above this part of the roof? If so, it’s probably something to do with connecting everything up.
 
Yes but if it’s just the end extension piece it’s probably no huge issue. The east sided one of that bay looks a little low, but does the walkway go directly above this part of the roof? If so, it’s probably something to do with connecting everything up.
Yeah the platform is above that part of the roof. Happy to wait and see how it all aligns by the end. Wouldn't be the first thing they would have had to adjust, of they do. Stuff like that happens, and on a project this scale it is inevitable.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top