North West Tonight

[Pigeonho]

Actually, I don't think it was a clarkie afterall. Paranoia reaches sad depths now, it seems.

RsoleofSalford, you're post was second. Not second 'behind the OP', just 2nd. You can look at that as fact or as a conspiracy I don't want to acknowledge the OP.

 

[r.soleofsalford]

Actually, I don't think it was a clarkie afterall. Paranoia reaches sad depths now, it seems.

RsoleofSalford, you're post was second. Not second 'behind the OP', just 2nd. You can look at that as fact or as a conspiracy I don't want to acknowledge the OP.

typical rag statement ^^^^

 

[Bluemanc1968]

Spurs where shit!!! they will be lucky to finish in the top 10!! Twitcher should stick to playing on the Wii

 

[Pigeonho]

Actually, I don't think it was a clarkie afterall. Paranoia reaches sad depths now, it seems.

RsoleofSalford, you're post was second. Not second 'behind the OP', just 2nd. You can look at that as fact or as a conspiracy I don't want to acknowledge the OP.

typical rag statement ^^^^

Care to expand, rather than just label?

 

[HalfwayUpTheKippax]

To be honest I don't like City conspiracy stuff. BUT North West Tonight coverage of the City parade was quite good until that twat Tony Livesey started reeling off all the trophies the scum have won over recent years. Not really necessary but then again neither is he. It's not as if he does anything that improves anybody's life.

 

[Sad Pie]

Granada said it - "marginally behind" the mighty blues on goal difference

why do they call tyldesley bongs

Tyldesley is known locally as 'Bongs' after the original name of the town 'Tyldesley Banks'. In local dialect 'Banks' became corrupted to 'Bongs.' The Banks refers to the hill upon which the town was established.

 

[Aguero is my king]

Some Blues are fucking embarassing. Rags claim that the BBC is biased, Liverpool claim the BBC is biased, Chelsea claim the BBC is biased, even teams live Wolves claim they are biased. Stop with the fucking conspiracy theory when we don't get mentioned in every fucking sentence said on air.

Edit: Here's an example actually. If it was us who had gone second tonight and the BBC mentioned that we had gone second behind UTD we would have some blues on here going it fucking disgraceful our win had nothing to do with them. However it's the other way round and they don't mention us apparently its bias. Stop with the paranioa

 

[bzekosilva]

do they have a edin dzeko do they fuck do they have a david silva do they fuck do they have a yaya toure have a kun aguero? none of the fuck---ing above!

 

[BillCarlisle]

SSN website current headline is Rags go joint top. Strange that - before the game the media was saying that City were top (above Wolves) on GD. Not joint top, 'top'.

My question therefore is............hypothetically, if at the end of the season City are top on GD over the Rags & say Chelsea, would City & Rags be joint champions and Chelsea runners-up ? I think not. Top is top, GD or not. There's no such thing as 'joint top' unless all the stats are identical, which at the moment they aren't.

A bit of consistent reporting wouldn't go amiss, would it ? Or is that too much to ask ? I think we all know the answer to that one.

 

[forevermancity]

Wow, just wow.