notlob vs spurs , then crystal palace vs villa

cookster said:
Hate dodgy arry but got to say having spent about a third of what we have, Spuds play good attacking football.
Click to expand...


This Spurs 11 cost £100m to put together. The City side that started yesterday cost £125m to put together. And we are a point ahead of them having scored more goals, despite playing two games less.

Grass is greener and all that shit.
 
No idea how spurs arnt winning, playing very well but cant put thier chances away, luckily for us its how they have been for weeks, still see them winning though, getting most of the decisions today also
 
Project said:
cookster said:
Hate dodgy arry but got to say having spent about a third of what we have, Spuds play good attacking football.
Click to expand...


This Spurs 11 cost £100m to put together. The City side that started yesterday cost £125m to put together. And we are a point ahead of them having scored more goals, despite playing two games less.

Grass is greener and all that shit.
Click to expand...

Maybe but I'm taking squad depth, a certain Robinho and Tevez weren't in the squad yesterday. That's an additional 60M to start with not to mention 18M spent on a cripple on the bench!!!
 
Sure I'll get piss taken out of me for asking, but why do we reverse Boltons name to notlob?
 
Bolton v Spurs...good game though it disappointed a bit in the last 20 mins.

Always a good game when Spurs play because they attack
 
cookster said:
Project said:
This Spurs 11 cost £100m to put together. The City side that started yesterday cost £125m to put together. And we are a point ahead of them having scored more goals, despite playing two games less.

Grass is greener and all that shit.
Click to expand...

Maybe but I'm taking squad depth, a certain Robinho and Tevez weren't in the squad yesterday. That's an additional 60M to start with not to mention 18M spent on a cripple on the bench!!!
Click to expand...


Squad depth doesn't give you attacking football as you only ever have 11 players on the pitch.

And lets not forget they had a 16m Robbie Keane out on loan, a 16m Pavlyuchenko on the bench, and 30m worth of central defenders not even playing (Woodgate, Kaboul and Bassong). Spurs have spent a small fortune on their squad whichever way you want to look at it.
 
Project said:
cookster said:
Maybe but I'm taking squad depth, a certain Robinho and Tevez weren't in the squad yesterday. That's an additional 60M to start with not to mention 18M spent on a cripple on the bench!!!
Click to expand...


Squad depth doesn't give you attacking football as you only ever have 11 players on the pitch.

And lets not forget they had a 16m Robbie Keane out on loan, a 16m Pavlyuchenko on the bench, and 30m worth of central defenders not even playing (Woodgate, Kaboul and Bassong). Spurs have spent a small fortune on their squad whichever way you want to look at it.
Click to expand...

LOL I can work that out for myself we don't play attacking football.
 
Villas songs are fucking shit, cheesey bunch of brummy tossers, they have some sort of arrogance, fuckin hate them!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top