andyhinch
Well-Known Member
It could have killed her :-)She did go down in instalments to be honest.
It could have killed her :-)She did go down in instalments to be honest.
I absolutely do. Don't get me wrong, he was rightly disqualified. He's shown scant regard in the past for people around the court with similar incidents but watch her again. She thinks about going down, hesitates and then decides to go down.you honestly believe she play acted ?!
Perhaps she knew that he was likely to be DQ if she fell to the ground and tried to stay on her feet. I don't think malice is the first thing that manifests itself when you've been hit by a moving object. More likely she was trying to ascertain if the pain was going to go away or not.I absolutely do. Don't get me wrong, he was rightly disqualified. He's shown scant regard in the past for people around the court with similar incidents but watch her again. She thinks about going down, hesitates and then decides to go down.
Wait for the compo claim when she realises there’s dough to be made can’t breath have nightmares etc
Yes I heard a story about a group of people waiting at a bus stop. Their bus was approaching when it collided with an other vehicle at an intersection, the people at the bus stop ran to jump on the bus so that they could claim they had been in the accident.Donating a signed jersey, match used racket and having a few photos would suffice. It's a shame some people have the claim mentality but that's the norm in the U.S.
you honestly believe she play acted ?!
Clearly unintentional, but also the right decision. The rules are the rules; he can have no complaints.Having just watched it it really does look like she was making a proper meal of it.
Disqualification did seem harsh too. he wasn't even looking.
Clearly unintentional, but also the right decision. The rules are the rules; he can have no complaints.
Same here, initially i thought they had screwed him over. On reflection, he was clearly fucked off and should have controlled his emotions better. If you don't, then accidents like this can happen and the ultimate deterrent for others doing it is for the worlds number 1 to be disqualified for such an act.I've kind of come round to this view aswell, if a player kicked a ball in anger after giving a way a foul and it smashed a ball boy in the face - the outcome would be the same.
Never happened, cameras on bus .Yes I heard a story about a group of people waiting at a bus stop. Their bus was approaching when it collided with an other vehicle at an intersection, the people at the bus stop ran to jump on the bus so that they could claim they had been in the accident.
the clip i watched said that the officials didn't even have Video Assist Replay to watch it again, and they still got it right, i wonder if these umpires could ref footy?Clearly unintentional, but also the right decision. The rules are the rules; he can have no complaints.
Wait for the compo claim when she realises there’s dough to be made can’t breath have nightmares etc
Beat me to it.Have Albanians been blamed yet?
I certainly don't think malice was involved and she thought he would be disqualified. I haven't suggested that. I just believe that there are two types of people - those that would stay on their feet after being hit by a tennis ball and those that would gradually fall to the floor.Perhaps she knew that he was likely to be DQ if she fell to the ground and tried to stay on her feet. I don't think malice is the first thing that manifests itself when you've been hit by a moving object. More likely she was trying to ascertain if the pain was going to go away or not.