[Official] Guardiola to manage City next season

Status
Not open for further replies.
Papers reporting that Pep could be sacked at Bayern as they are not happy about his work.Allegedly.

Pep Guardiola may be sacked at Bayern Munich before Manuel Pellegrini leaves Manchester City, with Bayern bosses unhappy he has already committed to City with important months of the season still to go.
 
According to the Mirror (hopefully a Mullock article as he seems connected) the rumours of a 'No Top 4' escape clause are totally false!

The shit stirring cunts are already trying to say Pep is falling out with City before he even starts. Apparently he isn't happy about the pre season tour of China or the proposed game against the rags.
As if he would even talk to the cunts about City when he's still with the German rags.
 
Papers reporting that Pep could be sacked at Bayern as they are not happy about his work.Allegedly.

Pep Guardiola may be sacked at Bayern Munich before Manuel Pellegrini leaves Manchester City, with Bayern bosses unhappy he has already committed to City with important months of the season still to go.
Don't mind if they do. That would give him valuable time to prepare for his coming job.
 
Papers reporting that Pep could be sacked at Bayern as they are not happy about his work.Allegedly.

Pep Guardiola may be sacked at Bayern Munich before Manuel Pellegrini leaves Manchester City, with Bayern bosses unhappy he has already committed to City with important months of the season still to go.
If Juventus knock Bayern out then for sure knives will be out for Pep.
 
The shit stirring cunts are already trying to say Pep is falling out with City before he even starts. Apparently he isn't happy about the pre season tour of China or the proposed game against the rags.
As if he would even talk to the cunts about City when he's still with the German rags.

That article in the Fail, earlier in the week, about the possibility of playing the rags in China tickled me. The first line was about Pep's "principles" facing a "huge test" because he was against playing against teams from the same league in friendlies. Read on a bit and it said he was "said to be uncomfortable" . Not quite a test of his principles then.

The same article, quite sneeringly, described our tour as a "quid pro quo" for the Chinese investment but, oddly, failed to mention why the rags would be there. Presumably a goodwill humanitarian gesture to give their billions of Chinese fans a once in a lifetime glimpse of Phil Jones in the flesh.
 
The same article, quite sneeringly, described our tour as a "quid pro quo" for the Chinese investment but, oddly, failed to mention why the rags would be there. Presumably a goodwill humanitarian gesture to give their billions of Chinese fans a once in a lifetime glimpse of Phil Jones in the flesh.
It also spectacularly fails to appreciate the meaning of quid pro quo; as if a pre-season tour lasting a couple of weeks serves as form of reciprocal arrangement for a nine figure long-term investment in our football club. Most football journalists are so fucking thick it's unbelievable.
 
It also spectacularly fails to appreciate the meaning of quid pro quo; as if a pre-season tour lasting a couple of weeks serves as form of reciprocal arrangement for a nine figure long-term investment in our football club. Most football journalists are so fucking thick it's unbelievable.
They must be valuing us at about £50m a game, biggest team in the world, I'm sure they'll follow the story up with a narrative along thoughs lines :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.