Oh, Hello.

[gaudinho's stolen car]

Has this kind of thing been banned or are we allowed to show covered women's bits?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Has this kind of thing been banned or are we allowed to show covered women's bits?

They look a couple of sizes too small.

 

[Why Always Ste]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

 

[talkativesprout]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

Did not notice she had one, till you brought it up ?

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

Nah. She's been raddled

 

[pudge]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

A tattoo, the size of your palm, on their lower back is hardly 'destroying' their beauty?

A 'Tyson-like' tattoo would do that though.

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

She's seen more sex than a copper's torch, I just wondered where we were up to censorship wise.

 

[johnmc]

Nice one OP!!! Just seen this doing the rounds. its a bloke.

 

[TCIB]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

This ^^ they look tacky and cheap.

 

[talkativesprout]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

This ^^ they look tacky and cheap.

Tacky and cheap, or free and easy, what are your hopes of winning ?

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

This ^^ they look tacky and cheap.

They can look ok if they are subtle and understated, but a big pair of fucking wings across the back (although these aren't, granted) isn't subtle or understated.

 

[talkativesprout]

Nice pic... But why do women insist on destroying their beauty with tattoo's?

This ^^ they look tacky and cheap.

They can look ok if they are subtle and understated, but a big pair of fucking wings across the back (although these aren't, granted) isn't subtle or understated.

"Im not gonna scuttle you, coz you aint subtle or understated"


That would be a first

 

[stony]

Can I just say that if you are starting another gratuitous lasses thread, please be careful were you source your images from. The last one was full of malware, mainly from the gifs that didactic posted.

 

[jimharri]

Can I just say that if you are starting another gratuitous lasses thread, please be careful were you source your images from. The last one was full of malware, mainly from the gifs that didactic posted.

Has he been told/warned?

Oh yeah:

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/5tTeD.jpg[/bigimg]

 

[JamesMCFC]

Can I just say that if you are starting another gratuitous lasses thread, please be careful were you source your images from. The last one was full of malware, mainly from the gifs that didactic posted.

I thought they were all from what the girls sent him...

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

 

[Gaylord du Bois]

You've lost me.

 

[johnmc]

I notice she has no engagement nor wedding ring.

 

[Bluebird1]

Can I just say that if you are starting another gratuitous lasses thread, please be careful were you source your images from. The last one was full of malware, mainly from the gifs that didactic posted.

Has he been told/warned?

Oh yeah:

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/5tTeD.jpg[/bigimg]

Her shoes are too small for her.

 

[gaudinho's stolen car]

I notice she has no engagement nor wedding ring.

"She"?