Omar Berrada to the rags

IMHO Omar will definitely have in his possession sensitive documentation from his time at City and will have been briefed on our defence against the 115 PL charges.

And all available just before the Independent Commission sits.

The dirty games just got ramped up a few levels.

CTID
How the fuck is it possible Elvis hasn’t left the building yet?
 
Presume he will be a key witness when our cases go for hearing.
Wonder how the rag fans will feel when their CEO is giving evidence in our favour.
It must be a given that Berrada would have input, in one form or another, into the panel considering our charges. Interesting.
I just have a feeling that City’s charges will not get to the panel and the matters will be dropped or settled to City’s satisfaction beforehand.
 
You know when somebody gets to 110 pages, so far, on Blue Moon, they are important. ;-)
I just ate a donut but I couldn’t find any nut but instead there’s a hole in the middle .
Now I’m confused why is it called a donut instead of dohole ?
 
The last 15 years the Rag media have told us all of the following will be the difference but finally they’ve nailed it with Omar Berrada…….

Fellaini

Januszai

Mad Louis

Angel Di Maria

Rojo

Blind

DePay

Ballin dor Martial

Schneiderlin

Pogba

Falcao

Giggsy

Mourinho

Sanchez

Zlatan

Lukaku

Matic

Mikhitaryan

Fred

Ole

Maguire

Ronaldo

Sancho

Wreck it Ralph

Ten Hag

The Butcher

The Fletcher twins

Casemiro

Pound land Haaland
3EC1022B-65D8-40A9-A511-7BC6FE8657B6.gif
 
He arrived after Mancini and after the original Etihad/Etisalat deals were signed. So he had absolutely no part in those. Also he wouldnt have needed to go out and find a company to buy the image rights, as the father & son behind Fordham already had relationships in Abu Dhabi. He simply wasn't a prime mover behind any of that.

Neither is his name mentioned in any of the Der Spiegel emails and nor was he a witness at CAS.

There's a lot of hot air about whether he was, or wasn't, involved in any of the stuff related to the charges, and what his new role means for the outcome of those. The simple fact is that he was offered a challenging new role and decided to step outside his comfort zone and take it. He had little or nothing to do with the events leading to the charges in my view and nor do they, or any supposed outcome, play any role in him leaving City and joining united.
Excellent detail.
I suppose the thing is people can't have it both ways saying oh no he wasn't involved it wasn't him but then hoping he can stitch city up with something like Harris is trying to do.
 
He arrived after Mancini and after the original Etihad/Etisalat deals were signed. So he had absolutely no part in those. Also he wouldnt have needed to go out and find a company to buy the image rights, as the father & son behind Fordham already had relationships in Abu Dhabi. He simply wasn't a prime mover behind any of that.

Neither is his name mentioned in any of the Der Spiegel emails and nor was he a witness at CAS.

There's a lot of hot air about whether he was, or wasn't, involved in any of the stuff related to the charges, and what his new role means for the outcome of those. The simple fact is that he was offered a challenging new role and decided to step outside his comfort zone and take it. He had little or nothing to do with the events leading to the charges in my view and nor do they, or any supposed outcome, play any role in him leaving City and joining united.

Totally agree.

IMO this is not that relevant to our case, whatsoever.

The case is PL vs Man city and the decision will be made by Premier League's Judicial Panel. It is not a court case. It is more an internal discipline matter inside a company.

And even if the charges stand, a big if, PL will punish the club. It is very unlikely PL will punish any individual. It is up to the club itself to do with its employees.
 
Last edited:

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top