If they start going on about the "council house", the easiest way to shut them up is to refer them to SSAP 21, which defines the accepted accounting treatment of operating leases. This states that the stadium is effectively an owned asset of the business, as we have the responsibility for maintaining and rebuilding it. Any increase in the stadium value is reflected in our accounts.
This is somewhat similar to people in Mayfair & Belgravia, where the freehold is owned by the Grosvenor Estate and the people who live in the properties (some of the most expensive in the country) are buying the lease, rather than the physical property. Instead of a standard ground rent, we pay the council based on an agreed formula, taking into account attendances and the prevailing interest rate. It's as though they lent us the money (although the money never actually changed hands) and that's reflected in the fact that we show it as a notional debt on ur balance sheet.
Our owners are shrewd businessmen and they recognise it's a much better deal than owning it outright.
Of course, when the Glazers have to start repaying ther debt in a few years, they will almst certainly have to sell and lease back the swamp to raise the capital. So they won't be payng the interest on the debt but will be paying about the same to rent their own stadium. Then I suspect we won't hear the "council house" jibes any more.