BuI think you make some valid points and the players have to take some responsibility......however what about Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal etc etc.... The same players and/or tactics let us down.... However Pellegrini refuses to change either !
I think you make some valid points and the players have to take some responsibility......however what about Spurs, Liverpool, Arsenal etc etc.... The same players and/or tactics let us down.... However Pellegrini refuses to change either !
Against Liverpool, we were out coached and beat straight up. But let's be factual here, the system and tactics have not been the same. Folks here just say that to have a stick to beat Pellars with.
Let's examine if you will:
Against Tothenham, we did exactly what folks often claim Pellars doesn't do. We started with 2 DMs, Dihno and Nando. Yaya at AM, with Sterling and DeBryune wide. We were dominant and up 1-0 comfortably. Then DeBryune made a silly error, after lines man missed the offside and they equalize.
2nd half our domination and chance creation continued. But they get a freekick, cross it in and Alderwierld beats Nando man for man. We continue strongly, asee were playing better and looked better. Then Erikson hits the 90 corner that bounces out perfectly for Kane. Suddenly it 3-1 and we are shocked to be this down. Again, none of the first 3 goals was a function of bad tactics or great football from Tothenham. Yes they dominated the last 15 minutes. Our players were dejected and chasing. But that game was one of our best footballing performances this season. Even though every one seems to have forgotten. Tactics were right, players preformed well, but results just went against us.
Liverpool, I'll give you, and anyone who asks. Yes we were outplayed. Yes we were out coached. Yes they showed superior effort and tactical nuance. But even that game varied significantly, from a tactical standpoint than any of the other lost game. But even after a tactical change waa made at halftime ( debunking another myth that Pellars never changes tactics till too late btw) we didn't look any better. Suggesting, tactics might not have saved us in that game. But let's even ignore that fact, and put that game on Pellars
But the tactics was different here than against Spurs. Again debunking the hard to shake fallacy that Pellars never changes.
At Arsenal, we did play porly, but the tactics there was similar to what we had yesterday. Delph was deployed wide to help, nullify the Ozil threat. I'll give you this though, Delph for all the accolad he gets here (myself included here) often does a poor job when deployed tactically.
Whether it's making a terrible choice if giving Barkley a straight line to our goal, or ball watching as Mahrez hustle past him yesterday. I can actually agree, that Pellars has been culpable in trusting him. And thus, may deserve some vlamw for it.
But let's be factual here, very few are here moaning about the Delph choices. Mostly, its the tired same ol same ol. Whine about playing Yaya, whine about play MD etc.
And while I personally agree about not playing MD, I find it laughable, that some whine about playing Delph out of position at Left mid, while in the same breathe pinning for playing Sagna out of position at CB.
Talk about consistently inconsistent fans :(
Last edited: