Palestine Action

hcblue95 said:
Got to admire your loyalty no matter how many women and children are murdered.
Click to expand...
I’m just asking as my parents are retired, everyone need a hobby so wondering if terrorism might be an option. If it’s ok for this lady to openly support a prescribed terrorist group as she’s 74, maybe my old fella can join Hamas, or Hesbolah, or Al Quaeda if he fancies something to do.
 
Johnny Mars Bar said:
I’m just asking as my parents are retired, everyone need a hobby so wondering if terrorism might be an option. If it’s ok for this lady to openly support a prescribed terrorist group as she’s 74, maybe my old fella can join Hamas, or Hesbolah, or Al Quaeda if he fancies something to do.
Click to expand...
Stretching it a bit there mate.
 
Like many on here, I'm sure that the ongoing mass murder is frustrating the hell out of us and everybody around the world who feel powerless to put a stop to Israel's wanton cruelty.

I've decided that every time one of Israel's defenders on here mentions Hamas I will post to remind people that Hamas are not the problem here. They never have been. Israel has been treating Palestinians appallingly since way before the birth of Hamas.
In addition as an occupied people the Palestinians are entitled to self defence and Hamas unlike the supine Palestinian authority are fulfilling that role.
 
The Fat el Hombre said:
Fantastic to see 74 year old terrorist supporter Audrey White detained this weekend, along with another hundred terrorist supporting muslamic jihadis. Jihadi Audrey had this to say:

"It’s designed to stop human rights and to stop protest and to stop free speech,” she said.

“There’s two things to be afraid of in this country and one is that we lose everything we are proud of – the ability to speak out – and the other is that we would ever be involved in a genocide.

“We look at these visions of children losing their limbs and being blown to bits. We’ve got to say: how can we stop our country’s involvement in this genocide? Everyone has a responsibility to stop horrors like this all throughout history.”

Fuck off Audrey you terrorist.

Kill the kids. Detain our elderly. This is what makes Britain great

www.theguardian.com

Woman, 74, tells of pain and fear after arrest at Liverpool pro-Palestine rally

Exclusive: Video shows veteran campaigner being dragged and handcuffed and she says bail conditions effectively confine her to her house
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

Can I just counter with

Paint on a plane

A military plane

Did we not learn from those women chaining themselves to fences?, okay they may have been peeved but scratching metal is just not on.

Then those fuckers making Bob late for work. He missed his bacon butty ffs!

And now this, its gone too fucking far.

I mean paint

On a plane grrrrrr....
 
Last edited:
KS55 said:
@Metal Biker. There is something I need to make clear. I am angry about the prescription of PA on behalf of democratic values, not on behalf of PA.
PA, like all these groups always suffer mission creep leading to action creep. They do break the law regularly but not in the way that the gov suggested ie terrorist action, except for the Brize Norton business. At that time I posted that that was stupid.
I believe the rule of law is the sine qua non of democracy and thus I have no love for PA. BUT the gov too must ensure that they do not mess with the rule of law and I think they have done so with the order against PA . As several distinguished lawyers have said, they are conflating protest with terror. As the gov is charged with trusteeship of the law, their sin is much the greater and longer lasting. The UN has said as much.
So, up the rule of law and down with ignoring it or messing with it. I don’t think I’ve committed an offence there, but you never know.
Click to expand...
I would think disabling a RAF jet counts as Terrorist act
 
frothy said:
I would think disabling a RAF jet counts as Terrorist act
Click to expand...
It does but not every act results in proscription. Those people were stupid. You need to pick your targets carefully.
Because they were not directed by PA to do that, the action to suspend the proscription may succeed.
 
KS55 said:
It does but not every act results in proscription. Those people were stupid. You need to pick your targets carefully.
Because they were not directed by PA to do that, the action to suspend the proscription may succeed.
Click to expand...
I imagine the Nazi regime probably thought the French resistance were terrorists.
Labelling people terrorists doesn't make the government right. And in this case supporting ethnic cleansing and murder definitely means our government are wronguns.
 
KS55 said:
It does but not every act results in proscription. Those people were stupid. You need to pick your targets carefully.
Because they were not directed by PA to do that, the action to suspend the proscription may succeed.
Click to expand...
How do you know they weren't directed by the Terrorist organisation PA? are you a member with inside knowledge?
 
Johnny Mars Bar said:
At what age does it become acceptable to support a prescribed terrorist group?

Does it come with a bus pass?
Click to expand...
No problem joining a prescribed terrorist group. How about the IDF?

It's proscribed groups you can't support.

It usually takes me a week to read last Saturday's Guardian. Here's Blake Morrison's poetic take:


If Laura Murton is guilty of terrorism for holding a Palestine flag, she’s in good company.

The Greenpeace ship crew arrested for piracy.
The Commies on a blacklist for McCarthy.
An 80-year-old who caused a ‘public nuisance’.
The Tiananmen Square guy standing up to tanks.
Five eco-freaks blocking a motorway.
Two Swedish women glued to a Monet.
Women campaigning to close a Migrant Removal Centre.
Bostonians throwing tea-chests in the harbour.
Wheelchair-users fighting cuts against Medicaid.
Nelson Mandela battling apartheid.
Anti-Putinites spoiling papers at the ballot.
A mass of trespassers on Kinder Scout.
John Lennon returning his gong to the Queen.
Martin Luther King and I have a dream.
The gay man removed from an LGBT parade.
Crowds in Minneapolis when George Floyd died.
The anti-oil lobby with its slogan Just Stop.
Weevils on trial for ruining a barley crop.
Gandhi on his salt march, Rosa Parks in her bus.
Emily Davison below the King’s horse.
Jamal Khashoggi, Martin Luther, Wat Tyler, Ned Ludd,
Alexei Navalny, Alan Turing, Joan of Arc, Robin Hood.
The naked woman sharing an apple with her mate.
The deity who put it out there to eat.
The tree surgeon who scaled Big Ben.
Three men spraying paint at Brize Norton.
Hundreds of Gazans at a food station.
Blake Morrison
 
frothy said:
How do you know they weren't directed by the Terrorist organisation PA? are you a member with inside knowledge?
Click to expand...
The founders have made it clear that they do not have or direct policies. They just organise protests. There is no evidence that PA organised the Brize Norton fiasco.
It is worth noting what the head of human rights at the UN has said about the proscription along with a large number of distinguished UK lawyers and five UN rapporteurs.
The up coming case will be a close run thing.
 
Last edited:
KS55 said:
The founders have made it clear that they do not have or direct policies. They just organise protests. There is no evidence that PA organised the Brize Norton fiasco.
It is worth noting what the head of human rights at the UN has said about the proscription along with a large number of distinguished UK lawyers and five UN rapporteurs.
The up coming case will be a close run thing.
Click to expand...
I expect the judge will be critical of the scope of the Terrorism Act, but say he's not above Parliament, and there is a statutory appeal against proscription (to the Proscribed Organisations Appeal Commission).
 
Blue and true said:
I'm curious as to how many of these lot were screaming "terrorist" when a bunch of scrotes were trying to burn down a hotel housing different ethnicities.
Click to expand...
I said it earlier in the thread, but the most revealing fact of all is that Starmer himself failed to call it terrorism when it happened. He called it an act of vandalism. So even the person who pushed the proscription doesn’t really believe it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top