Brewster's millions
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 5,242
It would save us all time, and it would frankly be more honest, if you just admitted that you want one set of laws for people that you don’t agree with, and another set - or to simply ignore the law - when it comes to people that you do agree with.Missing the point, deliberately I assume.
Can you imagine the briefing?
"They may be saying nothing. They may be old, pregnant, or disabled. But if they have a placard saying 'I support Palestine Action' they are committing an offence under the Terrorism Act. I know, you know, they are doing anything that yesterday was illegal, but it is illegal today. You may think it's daft. You may think it's a waste of police time, and you'd rather either be catching villains, or be taking your rest day. But I don't want the Daily Fascist saying we're stood there allowing terrorist offences to be committed."
Just checking, when you say "If the people arrested had wanted to engage in peaceful protest then they would not have been arrested" are you saying that standing quietly with a placard is not peaceful?
It’s the only logical conclusion to draw from your continued nonsense and bluster. I’m afraid this is just another thing you’ve got badly and rather embarrassingly wrong.