SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 89,068
That’s not true.Actually the 'top' 0.1% have 80% of the total off-shore funds.
That’s not true.Actually the 'top' 0.1% have 80% of the total off-shore funds.
The individual sovereign nations that set their own low tax rates and they made them for the benefit of their individual countries.So the question should be who made the rules and who were they made for?
You didn’t. You’re in Australia.Yet we still paid for her refurbishment
Doesn’t matter if he can bought or not. One nation can’t demand that all other nations change their corporation tax rates and America run the show as already stated and explained!You know the sebate stopped Obama in alot that he tried to do. You honestly think they can buy Corbyn? Honestly?
Me.Who on here voluntarily pays more tax than they need to?
The poorest earn nothing and therefore do not make any meaningful contribution to government revenues. I didn't say poor, I said poorest. The wealthy contribute most of the income tax revenue. What they do with their spare capital is none of our business so long as they operate within the rules. Investing in off shore funds is within the rules. The capital gains are taxed when they are brought on shore.
This is just envy disguised as moral outrage.
Do you publish your bank account details and assets online for everyone to have a read of?
That's not what I asked mate.More than happy for anyone to see my wage slip every month as are millions of others up and down the country no doubt.
Fuck all to hide and tax and NI are taken every month without fail ;-)
That's not what I asked mate.
No one publishes a breakdown of their income and assets, as such, they are "hidden" from public view.
"In all the micro-data we have access to, offshore wealth turns out to be extremely concentrated: the top 0.1% richest households own about 80% of it, and the top 0.01% about 50%."That’s not true.