Part time City fans!!!!!!!!!!

[baldybouncer]

so because somebody doesnt think hughes is doing a good job they are part time city fans??

do one you clown.

if you think sacking hughes is a good idea your the clown on here mate.

Who made you the God Almighty of all opinion then?

 

[JO 14]

Seriously undermined your argument with the stupid insult that has no foundation.

I agree that his purchases do appear to be good ones and that after a pre-season they should show their true potential.

To be a manager though you need tactical nouse in addition to talent spotting ability and this season hughes has shown none.

I'll trust the owners to make the call and if he's here next season I'll be behind him at the game but still unsure until he shows me his worth.

so if hughes has no tactical nouse why did the subs he made combine to score 5mins after coming on?

 

[mat]

JO 14......Get the fuck off your moral high ground! Who the fuck are you to call people "part time" just because they disagree with your opinion? Dick, i cant take you seriously!

And who the fuck are you to claim to know the abilities and potential that untested football managers posess?

"JO 14"

hows it going NBC?

 

[baldybouncer]

Seriously undermined your argument with the stupid insult that has no foundation.

I agree that his purchases do appear to be good ones and that after a pre-season they should show their true potential.

To be a manager though you need tactical nouse in addition to talent spotting ability and this season hughes has shown none.

I'll trust the owners to make the call and if he's here next season I'll be behind him at the game but still unsure until he shows me his worth.

so if hughes has no tactical nouse why did the subs he made combine to score 5mins after coming on?

Why didn't he start with them?

 

[hgblue]

The ARROGANCE of you Hughes lovers is absolutely breath taking. There's only one opinion in town and it's mine, and if you don't agree with me you're a part-timer, appears to be the message. Makes a change from the usual drivel of being accused of being a rag, wanting City to lose, etc etc etc.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Pearce had no resources, and he kept us in the premier league. Wasn't pretty and I can understand why many people hated the Pearce era, but it was an achievement.

Sven came in and had plenty to spend, it would be silly to judge him against the same standards as Pearce as he should have improved things. And he did, from 16th (I think) to 9th, and some great football to watch.

Hughes came in and had more resources in one season than any manager in history (total guess). Again, we shouldn't be judging him against the same standards as Sven, we should have done better. As it is we've gone backwards in terms of wins, losses and draws and at best have stayed the same in terms of league position.

Stupid suggestion that only part time City fans aren't happy with Hughes, but stupid suggestions like this seem to be the only defence people have for Hughes. And that says a whole lot in my book.

Jo14, this ^^^^ is what a good, well-reasoned post looks like.

And how did you get back from White Hart Lane so quickly? I assume you were actually at the game by the way that you're labelling fellow Blues as part-timers.

 

[GStar]

Pearce had no resources, and he kept us in the premier league. Wasn't pretty and I can understand why many people hated the Pearce era, but it was an achievement.

Sven came in and had plenty to spend, it would be silly to judge him against the same standards as Pearce as he should have improved things. And he did, from 16th (I think) to 9th, and some great football to watch.

Hughes came in and had more resources in one season than any manager in history (total guess). Again, we shouldn't be judging him against the same standards as Sven, we should have done better. As it is we've gone backwards in terms of wins, losses and draws and at best have stayed the same in terms of league position.

Stupid suggestion that only part time City fans aren't happy with Hughes, but stupid suggestions like this seem to be the only defence people have for Hughes. And that says a whole lot in my book.

Jo14, this ^^^^ is what a good, well-reasoned post looks like.

And how did you get back from White Hart Lane so quickly? I assume you were actually at the game by the way that you're labelling fellow Blues as part-timers.

Its decent up until the last sentence, and means you both obviously have selceted reading abilites or are just picking and choosing bits from what people are saying to fuel your own opinions.

 

[Dubai Blue]

Pearce had no resources, and he kept us in the premier league. Wasn't pretty and I can understand why many people hated the Pearce era, but it was an achievement.

Sven came in and had plenty to spend, it would be silly to judge him against the same standards as Pearce as he should have improved things. And he did, from 16th (I think) to 9th, and some great football to watch.

Hughes came in and had more resources in one season than any manager in history (total guess). Again, we shouldn't be judging him against the same standards as Sven, we should have done better. As it is we've gone backwards in terms of wins, losses and draws and at best have stayed the same in terms of league position.

Stupid suggestion that only part time City fans aren't happy with Hughes, but stupid suggestions like this seem to be the only defence people have for Hughes. And that says a whole lot in my book.

Jo14, this ^^^^ is what a good, well-reasoned post looks like.

And how did you get back from White Hart Lane so quickly? I assume you were actually at the game by the way that you're labelling fellow Blues as part-timers.

Its decent up until the last sentence, and means you both obviously have selceted reading abilites or are just picking and choosing bits from what people are saying to fuel your own opinions.

Judging Pearce and Hughes by the same standards is, at best, idiotic. Calling fellow Blues part-timers because they don't agree with you is spectacularly retarded.

So yes, his post did fuel my own opinions.

 

[GStar]

Judging Pearce and Hughes by the same standards is, at best, idiotic. Calling fellow Blues part-timers because they don't agree with you is spectacularly retarded.

So yes, his post did fuel my own opinions.

It seems you choose to mis out the main point of my post (ironically ;) )

I'll repeat that it was a good post up until the last setence.

 

[JO 14]

Pearce had no resources, and he kept us in the premier league. Wasn't pretty and I can understand why many people hated the Pearce era, but it was an achievement.

Sven came in and had plenty to spend, it would be silly to judge him against the same standards as Pearce as he should have improved things. And he did, from 16th (I think) to 9th, and some great football to watch.

Hughes came in and had more resources in one season than any manager in history (total guess). Again, we shouldn't be judging him against the same standards as Sven, we should have done better. As it is we've gone backwards in terms of wins, losses and draws and at best have stayed the same in terms of league position.

Stupid suggestion that only part time City fans aren't happy with Hughes, but stupid suggestions like this seem to be the only defence people have for Hughes. And that says a whole lot in my book.

Jo14, this ^^^^ is what a good, well-reasoned post looks like.

And how did you get back from White Hart Lane so quickly? I assume you were actually at the game by the way that you're labelling fellow Blues as part-timers.

mate look at your location, your from fukin dubai, and im assuming u dont even go to the home games so shut it u twat.