Pato or Balotelli

[Quinny851]

Just had a look at the below and wondered what anyone's thoughts are to it? I really rate Balotelli and given time I do believe he'll become world class but Pato is also rated just as highly.

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1344292/AC-Milan-prepared-use-Pato-bait-lure-Manchester-City-bad-boy-Mario-Balotelli.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... telli.html</a>

Thoughts??

 

[Mancio]

balo is twice pato

 

[SamTheGuru]

Balotelli. No point buying in a prospect just to replace him with another prospect. It would put us back a year.

 

[Stillsy]

Pato is just like Bojan. Massively overated.

Balotelli is better than them both by a long long way.

 

[Mancio]

anyway i know mancini love pato in the bit , so maybe he could be interested

 

[Mancio]

Pato is just like Bojan. Massively overated.

Balotelli is better than them both by a long long way.

pato is thrice bojan

 

[Balti]

Wahtever AC Milan say, think or wish, Balo is going nowhere.

The medja need to take a good luck at his last interview on the matter.

Yawn.

 

[Joga Bonito]

Completely different players

(LOL at the numpty to who compared Pato to Bojan Krkic.)

 

[Blueper]

Regardless of injury prone, I'd choose Pato

 

[Astuteboy]

Balo has to stay - he only just got here!

I like Pato a lot; lost his way a little at times and had a few injuries, but still has a lot of class and a lot of time left at the top level.

But Balo is staying which I think is great news for us, if not for the papers.

Anyway, if we really wanted Pato then we could probably just buy him outright. I know Milan turned down pretty huge money from Chelsea for him not too long ago, but we have more :) But with Dzeko etc coming, can't see us going for him any time soon.