Pedro Neto

[decmancity]

Getting a bit of traction online.

Would be an interesting signing, a lot of the raw attributes like Doku but with the prem experience already.

We have plenty of assets who Wolves would be interested in to sweeten the deal and he is also managed by Jorge Mendes who we do plenty of business with.

 

[FMwkdsoul]

Not sure there's much in this, the same site had him going to Arsenal not 24 hours before that story. Like him as a player (when he's fit) though. Gave Ake a torrid time in the game this season.

 

[dhruvblue]

Doku + Grealish + Foden + Bobb + Bernardo and one more winger that too from Wolves. Good going

 

[WestGorton]

Injury prone so far

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

We already have 5 wingers. I just don’t see the need for him at all. He’s also very injury prone

Some of these wolves players seem very overrated to me.

 

[Alan Harper's Tash]

We already have 5 wingers. I just don’t see the need for him at all. He’s also very injury prone

Some of these wolves players seem very overrated to me.

I’d say we had 1 winger and 4 playmakers.

If we are in for him, maybe Pep is returning to Sané/Sterling methods. He does change his methods each season to stay ahead of other clubs’ analysis teams.

 

[FMwkdsoul]

Far better options about for RW

 

[handsofstone]

Very good player, horrible injury record for a young guy

Not interested in this move (if true, which I doubt)

 

[Cheadle_hulmeBlue]

I’d say we had 1 winger and 4 playmakers.

If we are in for him, maybe Pep is returning to Sané/Sterling methods. He does change his methods each season to stay ahead of other clubs’ analysis teams.

Maybe, but they all play on the wing. Bernardo on the right is brilliant for instance. If we are returning to the sterling/ sane style of play we have to sign players that are better than what we have.

For me Neto isn’t better than foden, grealish, Bernardo, Doku on the wing and long term Bobb has more potential.

He’s a good player, but I don’t think it’s needed.

 

[Dax777]

Far better options about for RW

Not saying you are wrong. But examples are always helpful.