You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Pellers press conference
- Thread starter uwe28
- Start date
M
M
mat
Guest
Re: Pellers press confernce
Kolo and Mignolet press conference instead.
Kolo and Mignolet press conference instead.
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,599
Re: Pellers press confernce
Show me where I called your statement inaccurate please Mark.I just said you keep believing what you like.
markbmcfc said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Proelia said:Do you ever fuck off
No need at all....
-- Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:32 pm --
markbmcfc said:I would say theirs had a greater profile than ours, since it's a manager that has come from the same league and the fact it's united's first managerial presentation in 26 years.
Ok-You keep believing that!
What part of that statement is inaccurate?
Show me where I called your statement inaccurate please Mark.I just said you keep believing what you like.
Re: Pellers press confernce
I'm Watching it here
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/5006710/Manuel-Pellegrini-Press-conference-watch-live-video-here.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... -here.html</a>
karen7 said:where can I watch it,tried sun and mirror links but nothing
I'm Watching it here
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/football/5006710/Manuel-Pellegrini-Press-conference-watch-live-video-here.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sp ... -here.html</a>
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
Then i have no idea. Why do you think they aren't broadcasting it? Do you think that they think that if they don't show it, it isn't happening and they can just live in United land? There will be a reason they aren't showing it, a real reason and not one conjured up from the minds of paranoid City fans who seem to have more of a problem with our new fame than the news outlets they accuse of the very same thing.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Pigeonho said:What if City didn't allow them in, for whatever reason? Not suggesting that is what has happened, but what if it was for that reason?St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Pidge-Explain this mate and be honest.
Moyes news conference-Sky all over it for weeks shown live from start to finish
Pellegrini news conference-Fuck all.
A poster just said Wolves' PC was shown live, does that mean Sky love Wolves more than us? Maybe they are preparing a huge article on it later, and want to do it more justice than the long, drawn out process are live conference can be? Who knows? What I do know is there is no reason to not show it out of spite, which is what is being suggested here.
James Cooper-Sky sports news was there asking questions.It's biased as fuck mate.If you can't see that then fair does pal. As I said,I can't wait to smash this league this year.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.
It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.
You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Pigeonho said:Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.mat said:To be fair to SSN (which is rare). The fulham story breaking as well as the ashes may have put the conference down the pecking order. Will still be interested to see what angle they edit it though.Pigeonho said:Lol. Do you seriously believe Sky aren't showing it because it's us? There will be a reason why, and no one on here knows what it is. I can promise you now though that it isn't to A) blank us or B) to make us look cunts.
You've got to laugh at the sheer paranoia out of some of you at times.
Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.
It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.
You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
You know what to do then.Proelia said:Pigeonho said:No, i'm here to stay. Is that ok with you?Proelia said:Do you ever fuck off
No
Hart of the Matter
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2011
- Messages
- 5,180
Re: Pellers press confernce
Perhaps we didn't invite them?
Perhaps we didn't invite them?
St Helens Blue (Exiled)
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,599
Re: Pellers press confernce
I'm not clever enough to post stuff like that..but I agree with this..
gordondaviesmoustache said:Pigeonho said:Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.mat said:To be fair to SSN (which is rare). The fulham story breaking as well as the ashes may have put the conference down the pecking order. Will still be interested to see what angle they edit it though.
Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.
It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.
You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Your agument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that this "agenda" operates on an organised, conscious basis. It does not.
It exists subconsciously for historical, f
I'm not clever enough to post stuff like that..but I agree with this..
discopop
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
Really a throwaway line regarding the tour 5 secs if that, Sky are probably the biggest commercial stakeholder in the Prem and they have no rights to show a little of the process live? not even a coming up ticker, sorry on this occasion the coverage of us is piss poor Agenda or not.
Pigeonho said:You've not been listening then, as at the top of the hour they said, and I quote 'Pellegrini outlines his plans for the future', then went onto when they will bring those plans to the viewers.discopop said:Pigeonho said:Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.
That might be so but not one mention of the presser for the 30 odd mins I have just watched and now the yellow ticker...................Toure and Mignolet presser coming up! now I don't buy the full Agenda bollocks but you have to say its quite bizarre
Really a throwaway line regarding the tour 5 secs if that, Sky are probably the biggest commercial stakeholder in the Prem and they have no rights to show a little of the process live? not even a coming up ticker, sorry on this occasion the coverage of us is piss poor Agenda or not.
johnbmcr
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
so what was said ?
so what was said ?
M
M
mat
Guest
Re: Pellers press confernce
That would go against the clubs 'holistic' approach surely?Hart of the matter said:Perhaps we didn't invite them?
Bill
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
seriously did you expect anything else?
SuperMario's Fireworks. said:sky sports is a fucking disgrace, Moyes Press conference was banded around 2 weeks before, we just get the fucking cricket and united shitty tour of south africa instead.
AGENDA
seriously did you expect anything else?
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,444
Re: Pellers press confernce
It's not an anti-City thing, but they are pro-Utd. Even my myopic rag mates accept this, I think everybody accepts it don't they?
Sky know Utd are their life blood.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Pigeonho said:Lol. Do you seriously believe Sky aren't showing it because it's us? There will be a reason why, and no one on here knows what it is. I can promise you now though that it isn't to A) blank us or B) to make us look cunts.
You've got to laugh at the sheer paranoia out of some of you at times.
Pidge-Explain this mate and be honest.
Moyes news conference-Sky all over it for weeks shown live from start to finish
Pellegrini news conference-Fuck all.
It's not an anti-City thing, but they are pro-Utd. Even my myopic rag mates accept this, I think everybody accepts it don't they?
markbmcfc
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
Come on, we both know you were insinuating that I was talking bollocks.
Either that, or you were giving me permission to believe my own opinion....which is a little odd but, fair enough.
Anyway, this is petty. If you feel Sky are biased then fair enough, sometimes I would agree. On this particular issue I don't, with the blue tinted specs off there is no way our presser has a higher profile than the Moyes one, which could explain the difference in coverage. That's all I'm saying.
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:markbmcfc said:St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Ok-You keep believing that!
What part of that statement is inaccurate?
Show me where I called your statement inaccurate please Mark.I just said you keep believing what you like.
Come on, we both know you were insinuating that I was talking bollocks.
Either that, or you were giving me permission to believe my own opinion....which is a little odd but, fair enough.
Anyway, this is petty. If you feel Sky are biased then fair enough, sometimes I would agree. On this particular issue I don't, with the blue tinted specs off there is no way our presser has a higher profile than the Moyes one, which could explain the difference in coverage. That's all I'm saying.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
And I'm not clever enough to post it properly first time round!
Edited :-)
St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:I'm not clever enough to post stuff like that..but I agree with this..gordondaviesmoustache said:Pigeonho said:Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.
Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.
It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.
You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Your agument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that this "agenda" operates on an organised, conscious basis. It does not.
It exists subconsciously for historical, f
And I'm not clever enough to post it properly first time round!
Edited :-)
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
I am not having it though that there is some agenda to stop City or to not broadcast certain things in the hope people don't see them. Why would they do that?
I love GDM, he is the most articulate on here and very funny with it, genuinely, and he can take the banter too.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:gordondaviesmoustache said:Pigeonho said:Angle? Why would they have an angle?! You do realise we are one of 4 clubs they now use in their ads? We are on their billboards, the SSN ads - anything. Sky have as much interest in promoting us now as they do United, because we are big news the world over. Why alienate one club to concentrate on what another brings, when you can have both on board? They really do have no reason to have an agenda against the club, none whatsoever. We are now above the mighty Liverpool in the eyes of the footballing community, and Liverpool were the other club people on here used to be paranoid about too.
Your argument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that the "agenda" operates on an organised, fully conscious basis. It does not.
It exists, in the main, subconsciously, for historical and financial reasons, but exists it most certainly does.
You've never struck me as especially naive :-)
Your agument is, as usual, predicated on the basis that this "agenda" operates on an organised, conscious basis. It does not.
It exists subconsciously for historical, f
I'm not clever enough to post stuff like that..but I agree with this..
I am not having it though that there is some agenda to stop City or to not broadcast certain things in the hope people don't see them. Why would they do that?
NipHolmes
Well-Known Member
Re: Pellers press confernce
If a shop sells 20 products but ones a best seller which one do you think they will peddle the most? United are the Big Mac at McDonald's.
It's common sense they play up to the rags because that's their market. Same as the press.
SWP's back said:Sky know Utd are their life blood.St Helens Blue (Exiled) said:Pigeonho said:Lol. Do you seriously believe Sky aren't showing it because it's us? There will be a reason why, and no one on here knows what it is. I can promise you now though that it isn't to A) blank us or B) to make us look cunts.
You've got to laugh at the sheer paranoia out of some of you at times.
Pidge-Explain this mate and be honest.
Moyes news conference-Sky all over it for weeks shown live from start to finish
Pellegrini news conference-Fuck all.
It's not an anti-City thing, but they are pro-Utd. Even my myopic rag mates accept this, I think everybody accepts it don't they?
If a shop sells 20 products but ones a best seller which one do you think they will peddle the most? United are the Big Mac at McDonald's.
It's common sense they play up to the rags because that's their market. Same as the press.