Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 37,690
I notice no answer to this question. Fits with my opinion that he’s a little kid.How long have you supported city for?
I notice no answer to this question. Fits with my opinion that he’s a little kid.How long have you supported city for?
Which was his 3rd year hence your attention to detail is fucking shitYup.
That's the same year where the word "interim" - meaning not permanent - indeed stopgap - someone intended to shore things up on a temporary basis - came completely undone - the year in which we would have wished for virtually any manager instead.
Agreed with all of what you've posted.An ok manager was McNeil. Machin or Horton. When we weren't all self entitled nobs. Any manager who won what Manuel in most fans eyes would be legend status. Does losing the dressing room count for Roberto as well. Manuel is one of the classiest people you could meet.
Do you know who that was? Seemed the only whu player who didn't give much of a shit.
My apologies - this is my last post in the current thread.Can we discuss the subject of the topic please
I have loved our last 3 managers.
All great men.
Some good points.
Yet - given the great manager that Pellers supposedly is - wouldn't he have known that he was stopgap going into City?
And yet he accepted the job.
Credit to him for that.
And won a title with Mancini's squad - in his first year - turning dressing room support around.
And yet...
1) Lost the plot entirely in his second year;
2) Failed to motivate player whatsoever in his second year;
3) Was a tactical/strategic idiot throughout his tenure - making bizarre substitutions and choice of starting lineups throughtou;
4) Had zero attention to detail - to wit, the CL game v. Bayern.
Yeah - Pellers didn't criticize our side - or go out of his way to upset players. He's a gentleman for sure - but he's for sure my least favorite City manager for years and years running.
Leave Stuart Pearce out of this it brings back some bad memories.You’ve lost the plot entirely but that last statement is complete nonsense. Even if you’re only talking post takeover it’s impossible to like Pellegrini less than Hughes and that ignores literally dozens of other candidates