Manchester City is a single legal entity, so IS is correct, ARE would be incorrect.Shouldn’t that be Manchester City ARE …fucking grammar on these c**ts !!
All good things come to an end.They both have to leave some time. Summer 2025 may be the best time. Pep completes 5 in a row and regains the CL. We take the pinch of a 6 point deduction taking the pressure off the new man in his first season and the club resets for another 15 years or more of glory by the end of which I will have shed my mortal coil.
IMO there won't be any extension. He'll see us through next season and that'll be it. Vamoose.Just sign another extension Pep and piss off all the other clubs.
But Manchester City IS a football club with a number of shareholdersManchester City is a single legal entity, so IS is correct, ARE would be incorrect.
Yes, but will Pep stay?I have a feeling Pepe will stay, praying so
But candidates are small for City style
Xavi, Enrique are not it
Main people for the job probably will be
Michel
Maresca
Nagelsmann
De Zerbi
Xabi Alonso with the promise of backing him, at Real he wont be backed
Outside chance
Demichelis
Martín Demichelis Tactics & Formations At River Plate 2023/24
Tactical analysis of Martín Demichelis tactics at River Plate this season including style of play and formations breakdown with examples.totalfootballanalysis.com
Gallardo maybe, but hes stock has fallen in my eyes when he went to KSA
Kompany
For the future
Gundogan
It’s nothing to do with being a legal entity, it’s a description of more than one person so it is a collective noun and therefore should use “are” not “is”. Unfortunately most of the world tend to use the Americanised version of English which is why this happens.Manchester City is a single legal entity, so IS is correct, ARE would be incorrect.