Pep's contract situation | 2 year extension confirmed! (pg1817)

SSL2 said:
Thanks for bringing that to my attention.

Absolute fantastic reading. Link below for anyone who wants a laugh this morning.

Pep Guardiola agrees 1 year contract extension | Includes additional 1 year option

Interesting news
www.redcafe.net www.redcafe.net
Click to expand...
Just dropped my own little bomb in there in answer to this whopper:

BeforeKeanetherewasRobson said:
To think City’s owners wouldn’t have stopped this before now if they could, is very naive… given more corrupt things happen every day (including by them) and that they’re a nation state with Govt ties, unlimited wealth and the best sports lawyer in the country. They tried to stop the Oct case being heard but it was … they said they’d win all the charges but they didn’t.

Let’s see what Fridays vote brings. Hopefully City desperately pressurizing clubs and paying Samuels and Keegan tons to keep posting their viewpoint, isn’t enough. A lot of clubs will vote against City for their own reasons/the right thing to do… guessing City, Villa, Chelsea, Newcastle don’t.
Click to expand...
What October case is this? Are you referring to the APT case? If you are, I think you will find that it was the Premier League who wanted to delay the announcement of the outcome and City were more than happy to put it out there.

And what's all this about "they said they'd win all the charges but they didn't"? You do realise that there were no charges against City in the APT case because it was City who brought the case against the PL don't you? Not only that, City didn't have to win on every single point to prove that the rules were unlawful. They only had to win on a single one. And speaking of unlawful, it says a hell of a lot about you when your last paragraph basically says you're in favour of clubs voting for amended rules on Friday that could still turn out to be unlawful just because it's a vote against City. It'll be interesting to see which way United vote, considering you don't have a single penny of interest-free shareholder loans on your books and your new saviour Ratcliffe can't get enough of blowing smoke up City's arse in terms of how well we're run as a club.

Your post couldn't be more full of ignorance and bullshit if you tried. It's only topped by the sheer amount of unfounded horseshit spouted on the 115/129/130 charges thread. It often makes me wonder if anyone's doing any moderating when it comes to that particular topic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.