I thought city were welcoming the investigation so we could “clear our name once and for all” .. rather than trying to force the PL to back offSo you're claiming City are blackmailing the PL into backing off?
I thought city were welcoming the investigation so we could “clear our name once and for all” .. rather than trying to force the PL to back offSo you're claiming City are blackmailing the PL into backing off?
Totally legit mate, 15 years on this forum should tell you that.
@Ric is aware of some more detail, feel free to check that.
So you're claiming City are blackmailing the PL into backing off?
Must have been a change of tactic, we've decided to tell randoms that we're blackmailing the PL but to keep it under your hat.I thought city were welcoming the investigation so we could “clear our name once and for all” .. rather than trying to force the PL to back off
That’s my thinking too. If we’re relying on a voice recording to clear our name then that just screams guilty imo. Or perhaps we don’t have total faith in the independent panel, in other words our fate is the hands of another kangaroo court.I thought city were welcoming the investigation so we could “clear our name once and for all” .. rather than trying to force the PL to back off
Fair play mate. Sometimes people do get passed on genuine info. Either way I hope the premier league case is closed or it comes out in the wash. A 93.20 political goal would be great.You're perfectly entitled to your opinion, but I can assure it is not made up nonsense and I'm old and wise enough to know the difference.
We've been laughed at for decades, so a few more giggles is water off this particular ducks back.
I thought city were welcoming the investigation so we could “clear our name once and for all” .. rather than trying to force the PL to back off
So you're claiming City are blackmailing the PL into backing off?