Whilst respecting that the person who shared is a longstanding poster, if our defence to accusations of what basically amounts to a decade of alleged accounting fraud is "but...but...referees" my gut feeling is we might be up shite creek without a paddle.
I think he's been fed some hooky information. No issue with him sharing it amongst friends, but it sounds very far-fetched, and even if true wouldn't really impact on our case.
When weighing things of this nature up I always ask myself how I'd feel if I'd read it on RAWK.