PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules

Is one of the charges that we've been paying more in transfer fees than we've actually reported?
Was in an argument over the weekend when pointing out that we're 10th in the net spend table for the last years.

I argued that this wasn't one of the charges.
If for example we report the transfer fee for Nathan Ake of £40m, we pay Bournemouth that and they reflect that on their accounts.
If we actually pay them £60m but they report it as £40m, then they are guilty too for false accounting surely?

I'm no lawyer or forensic accountant sadly, unlike the majority of football fans on Twitter these days.
 
IrishBlueSince92 said:
Is one of the charges that we've been paying more in transfer fees than we've actually reported?
Was in an argument over the weekend when pointing out that we're 10th in the net spend table for the last years.

I argued that this wasn't one of the charges.
If for example we report the transfer fee for Nathan Ake of £40m, we pay Bournemouth that and they reflect that on their accounts.
If we actually pay them £60m but they report it as £40m, then they are guilty too for false accounting surely?

I'm no lawyer or forensic accountant sadly, unlike the majority of football fans on Twitter these days.
Click to expand...
And you tend to believe it? So we're now paying more than what has been stated? LOL What next.
 
IrishBlueSince92 said:
Is one of the charges that we've been paying more in transfer fees than we've actually reported?
Was in an argument over the weekend when pointing out that we're 10th in the net spend table for the last years.

I argued that this wasn't one of the charges.
If for example we report the transfer fee for Nathan Ake of £40m, we pay Bournemouth that and they reflect that on their accounts.
If we actually pay them £60m but they report it as £40m, then they are guilty too for false accounting surely?

I'm no lawyer or forensic accountant sadly, unlike the majority of football fans on Twitter these days.
Click to expand...
Any opposition fans claiming we're doing that needs putting in a padded cell. As you say, it would mean that the selling clubs are in on it too ffs!
 
Shuffs said:
5 Live this morning.......if City do the treble, would United's be considered "Pure"

Just fuck off.
Click to expand...
Course it would. They grew a squad from seeds in the greenhouse at the cliff back then. The millions they spent throughout the 90s, smashing transfer records when there was about 2 other rich clubs in the league, didn't have anything at all to do with it.
 
Was it necessary for the PL to cite "115" charges ? Why couldn't they just say charges relating to? I know we all blame the red shirts and the other red shirt arse lickers for these charges they pushed for against us. The narrative yet again has been set further, the average gimp supporters of these hard done to clubs are of the opinion that we have committed 115 separate, under the counter, dodgy transfers and sponsorship deals-when the actual truth is completely different to the narrative set. Granted yes that technically their are 115 charges against us and this just seems that the PL have thrown us under the bus through sensationalism, against a club that invests in the local community with jobs and infrastructure? The PL have handled this disgracefully in my humble opinion.
 
flb said:
Was it necessary for the PL to cite "115" charges ? Why couldn't they just say charges relating to? I know we all blame the red shirts and the other red shirt arse lickers for these charges they pushed for against us. The narrative yet again has been set further, the average gimp supporters of these hard done to clubs are of the opinion that we have committed 115 separate, under the counter, dodgy transfers and sponsorship deals-when the actual truth is completely different to the narrative set. Granted yes that technically their are 115 charges against us and this just seems that the PL have thrown us under the bus through sensationalism, against a club that invests in the local community with jobs and infrastructure? The PL have handled this disgracefully in my humble opinion.
Click to expand...

It seems a coordinated attack, it was rushed, factually incorrect & leaked.

I think handling it disgracefully is putting it mildly.
 
Gordyola said:
There was no referendum to join the EEC, Heath government lied to the public and parliament about the ultimate MO of the EU which was to become a federal state, Wilson held a referendum in 1973 and perpetuated the lie, there was no social media in those days. Its an utter insult to the intelligence of the people who voted in the recent referendum that those who voted to leave were stupid but, those who voted to remain were highly intelligent people. The remain campaign told nothing but the truth of course
Click to expand...
And of course Brexit has been such a roaring success. Well for those like ReesMogg who hid his money in Dublin, or Redwood who said don’t buy British, or that twat trying to buy the rags or Dyson moving his HQ to Singapore etc
 
IrishBlueSince92 said:
Is one of the charges that we've been paying more in transfer fees than we've actually reported?
Was in an argument over the weekend when pointing out that we're 10th in the net spend table for the last years.

I argued that this wasn't one of the charges.
If for example we report the transfer fee for Nathan Ake of £40m, we pay Bournemouth that and they reflect that on their accounts.
If we actually pay them £60m but they report it as £40m, then they are guilty too for false accounting surely?

I'm no lawyer or forensic accountant sadly, unlike the majority of football fans on Twitter these days.
Click to expand...
All transfer and contacts have to be ratified by the football authorities end of
What is reported in the media can be different depending upon the agenda
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.