"The Big 5" term predates the PL by some distance.
A phrase coined in the 70's and Swales was on a mission to make it 6 with us
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
PL charge City for alleged breaches of financial rules
- Thread starter ayrshire_blue
- Start date
A phrase coined in the 70's and Swales was on a mission to make it 6 with us
Spellbinding
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 52
- Team supported
- Manchester City
City are going to be absolutely cleared of these ridiculous, ludicrous and absurd allegations. Which would thereafter illustrate the distinguished and exalted stature of our beloved club.
Last edited:
flb
Well-Known Member
I concur , in layman’s turns as far as I understand what the fuck is going on !Fuckin Brilliant that mate.
flb
Well-Known Member
Swales lived off his FA connections , thinking that it would be enough - he should have stuck to selling TV’s for a living , that guy fucked this club , from a genuine big title chasing club in the 70’s to the shite we became in the old third division."The Big 5" term predates the PL by some distance.
A phrase coined in the 70's and Swales was on a mission to make it 6 with us
So if there is no appeal process then City should drag this out for 20 years at least.I think just a no would be sufficient!
flb
Well-Known Member
I’d love it tbh , it’s press who are pushing for a result have you noticed , if we were sitting in tenth position it would be chipshop paper wrappings. You can see that with the“law bending” that Chelsea are doing , not a murmur or a fucking sniff about what they are doing.So if there is no appeal process then City should drag this out for 20 years at least.
york away to this!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 23 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 10,694
City's going down with a billion on the bench...Benches,
Rags Tuppence
City a Billion
We picked one, UEFA picked one, then when the third member (chair) was needed, City suggested a member from CAS1 panel as he was familiar with the case. All parties agreed to our suggestion.Someone was telling me the other day that we picked 2 out of the 3 judges in the case at CAS. I can't find anything out online about how they were selected is this true?
Gorton_Tubster
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Apr 2012
- Messages
- 16,272
- Location
- Riding the blue tidal wave.
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Is like to know what cheating actually is (in the eyes of the red media)..
If we get a fine = cheating?
Docked points = cheating?
Relegation = cheating?
I suspect nothing will still = cheating.
More importantly is there any way of linking the accusations to what the team are doing right now? I don't understand that link.
It's like the media have gone to this childish jealousy thing of just shouting cheats whilst having fingers in ears whenever we win anything.
So in future, will they be able to say we were cheating if we get a fine. Can we take them to court and shut them up.
Naive question probably.
If we get a fine = cheating?
Docked points = cheating?
Relegation = cheating?
I suspect nothing will still = cheating.
More importantly is there any way of linking the accusations to what the team are doing right now? I don't understand that link.
It's like the media have gone to this childish jealousy thing of just shouting cheats whilst having fingers in ears whenever we win anything.
So in future, will they be able to say we were cheating if we get a fine. Can we take them to court and shut them up.
Naive question probably.